Melanie Ho

Melanie Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 33 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical law and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 21% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Melanie Ho has demonstrated expertise across 132 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Financial Centre	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Failure to Diagnose	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dentistry and dental practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Overcharging of fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Neurology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ophthalmology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auxiliary Police Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exchange of information	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accident Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Website Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accident Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Overdose	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Double Taxation Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Melanie Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Melanie Ho has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	14 cases	42% of cases	PP v Wong Chee Meng: Corruption, PCA, Public Servant, Town Council Contracts(Jul 2020) Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Accounting of Estate Assets & Beneficiary Rights Under Discretionary Trusts(May 2018) Quek Kwee Kee v. American International Assurance: Accident Insurance & Drug Intoxication(Feb 2017)
Harry Elias Partnership	13 cases	39% of cases	Chai Chwan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings(May 2009) Zage v Rasif: Dishonest Assistance & Knowing Receipt in Money Laundering via Precious Stones(Dec 2008) Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Ophthalmology(May 2008)
Wong Partnership LLP	6 cases	18% of cases	Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme: Issue Estoppel & Summary Judgment in Breach of Contract Dispute(Sep 2019) Tong Seok May Joanne v Yau Hok Man Gordon: Medical Negligence, Anaesthesia, Informed Consent, Neck Injury(Dec 2012) Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Appointment(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Melanie Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 7 (21%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	143.1 parties avg	3.1	42%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	3%
Partial	45.1 parties avg	5.1	12%
Won	152.6 parties avg	2.6	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	62.8 parties avg	2.8
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Melanie Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(41%)	41%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(12%)	12%
Won	15(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	216,404.63	15,457.4714 cases	14
USD	159,717.25	159,717.251 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	6 15	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 5 cases (83.3%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 33 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Wong Chee Meng: Corruption, PCA, Public Servant, Town Council Contracts 15 Jul 2020 Wong Chee Meng (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	Wong Chee Meng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed, Sentence EnhancedWong's appeal was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.
2	Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme: Issue Estoppel & Summary Judgment in Breach of Contract Dispute 29 Sep 2019 Merck & Co., Inc (Defendant)Neutral	29 Sep 2019	Merck & Co., Inc (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
3	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Accounting of Estate Assets & Beneficiary Rights Under Discretionary Trusts 17 May 2018 Lakshmi Prataprai Bhojwani (Plaintiff)Lost	17 May 2018	Lakshmi Prataprai Bhojwani (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for an account of the estate assets was dismissed, and the Plaintiff was ordered to pay fixed costs of $2,000 to the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Quek Kwee Kee v. American International Assurance: Accident Insurance & Drug Intoxication 01 Feb 2017 Ker Kim Tway (Executor of the Estate of Quek Kiat Siong, deceased) (Appellant)Won	01 Feb 2017	Ker Kim Tway (Executor of the Estate of Quek Kiat Siong, deceased) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below and also make the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Cordlife Group v. Cryoviva Singapore: Trademark, Copyright Infringement & Passing Off Assessment 14 Apr 2016 Cordlife Group Limited (Plaintiff)Won	14 Apr 2016	Cordlife Group Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $63,904.63 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Quek Kwee Kee Victoria v American International Assurance: Accident Insurance & Drug Overdose 28 Mar 2016 Ker Kim Tway (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Mar 2016	Ker Kim Tway (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Susan Lim v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal on Party-and-Party Costs for Disciplinary Hearings 08 Mar 2016 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2016	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the High Court Judge was dismissed, in favor of the Singapore Medical Council.
8	AXY v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Information Exchange & International Tax Cooperation 03 Nov 2015 AYB (Applicant)Partial	03 Nov 2015	AYB (Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the production of certain documents.
9	Dukkar S.A v Thailand Integrated Services: Mareva Injunction & Breach of Contract Dispute 06 Sep 2015 Thailand Integrated Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Sep 2015	Thailand Integrated Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for Mareva injunction dismissed with costs fixed at $9,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Singapore Medical Council v Lim Mey Lee Susan: Review of Party-and-Party Bills of Costs for Disciplinary Proceedings 12 May 2015 Singapore Medical Council (Applicant)Partial	12 May 2015	Singapore Medical Council (Applicant): PartialThe court reviewed the Assistant Registrar's taxation of costs, adjusting the amounts allowed for the inquiry before the disciplinary committees and the appeal to the Court of Three Judges. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Li Huabo v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property under s 411 Penal Code 09 Jul 2014 Li Huabo (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2014	Li Huabo (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for dishonestly receiving stolen property was dismissed.
12	Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Innovative Medical Treatment 28 Nov 2013 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	28 Nov 2013	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Tong Seok May Joanne v Yau Hok Man Gordon: Medical Negligence, Anaesthesia, Informed Consent, Neck Injury 18 Dec 2012 Tong Seok May Joanne (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Dec 2012	Tong Seok May Joanne (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for medical negligence was dismissed with costs.
14	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Bias 29 Nov 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Walton International v Loh: Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty 02 Jun 2011 Loh Pui-Pui Sharon (Defendant)Won	02 Jun 2011	Loh Pui-Pui Sharon (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedMs. Loh's counterclaim for wrongful dismissal was allowed, and she was awarded US$159,717.25 in damages.
16	Walton International v Yau Kwok Seng: Conspiracy, Solicitation & Breach of Confidence Dispute 02 Jun 2011 Yau Kwok Seng Winston (Defendant)Won	02 Jun 2011	Yau Kwok Seng Winston (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Appointment 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Application DismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application for judicial review.
18	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Revocation 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Discovery application dismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's discovery application.
19	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Application for Quashing and Prohibiting Orders 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Leave GrantedLeave granted to the applicant to apply for a Quashing Order and a Prohibiting Order.
20	Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Therapeutic Ultrasound 09 Feb 2010 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	09 Feb 2010	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Disciplinary Committee's decision.
21	Chai Chwan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings 12 May 2009 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	12 May 2009	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Application for leave for judicial review dismissedDr. Chai was ordered to pay the SMC costs fixed at $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Zage v Rasif: Dishonest Assistance & Knowing Receipt in Money Laundering via Precious Stones 29 Dec 2008 Kaori Kathleen Zage (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Dec 2008	Kaori Kathleen Zage (Plaintiff): Claims against fourth and fifth defendants dismissed; judgment against sixth defendant.Claims against Ho Chi Kwong and Jewels DeFred Pte Ltd dismissed. Judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs against Lim Soon Kiang for US$583,358, being 94.09% of US$620,000. The judgment sum is to be reduced by any sum granted to the Plaintiffs (from the money transferred by Tran) in or after the conclusion of the disposal inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Ophthalmology 25 May 2008 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	25 May 2008	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Singapore Medical Council's decision finding Dr. Low Cze Hong guilty of professional misconduct was upheld.
24	Hennedige Oliver v Singapore Dental Council: Professional Misconduct & Informed Consent 28 Nov 2006 Singapore Dental Council (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2006	Singapore Dental Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Disciplinary Committee's decision was allowed, effectively dismissing the DC's original decision.
25	Shorvon Simon v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Scope of Costs Under Medical Registration Act 16 Oct 2005 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	16 Oct 2005	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Costs reduced on appealThe court reduced the costs awarded to the Singapore Medical Council.
26	Singapore Medical Council v Shorvon Simon: Taxation of Costs in Disciplinary Proceedings 08 May 2005 Singapore Medical Council (Applicant)Lost	08 May 2005	Singapore Medical Council (Applicant): Applications dismissedThe Singapore Medical Council's application for review of the Assistant Registrar's decision was dismissed, and they were ordered to bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Sep 2004 Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant)Lost	07 Sep 2004	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for trafficking in a controlled drug was dismissed.
28	Chia Sok Kheng Kathleen v The Management Corporation: Strata Title Dispute over Renovation Approval and Management Corporation's Duties 14 Jul 2004 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 669 (Defendant)Won	14 Jul 2004	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 669 (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim was allowed, and the plaintiff was ordered to reinstate the wall to its original state.
29	TJ System v Ngow Kheong Shen: Defamation Claim for Email Alleging Bribery 21 Sep 2003 Ngow Kheong Shen (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2003	Ngow Kheong Shen (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; total damages awarded against the defendant amounted to $125,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Wong Tiew Yong v PP: Auxiliary Police Officers' Conduct & Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2003 Wong Tiew Yong (Appellant)Partial	27 Aug 2003	Wong Tiew Yong (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed. Fine of $500 imposed on each charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
31	Quah Su-Ling v Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd: Abridgement of Time for EOGM Notice under Companies Act 23 Jul 2001 Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Jul 2001	Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Application DeniedApplication for stay of orders disallowed.
32	De Souza Tay & Goh v Singapore Press Holdings: Defamation Claim over Article on L&H 15 Jun 2001 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant)Won	15 Jun 2001	Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' defamation claim was dismissed.
33	Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific: Payment Confirmation & Invoice Discounting Dispute 19 Apr 2000 Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2000	Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.