AXY v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Information Exchange & International Tax Cooperation

In AXY and others v Comptroller of Income Tax, the Singapore High Court addressed an application for judicial review by Korean nationals (AXY, AXZ, AYA, AYB) against the Comptroller's decision to provide their banking information to the National Tax Service of the Republic of Korea (NTS) under s 105D of the Income Tax Act and Article 25 of the Singapore-Korea Double Taxation Agreement. The applicants sought to prohibit the Comptroller from disclosing their banking activity and to quash the Notices issued to Singaporean banks. The court allowed the Registrar's Appeal in part and Summons in part, ordering the disclosure of certain documents while emphasizing the importance of international tax cooperation and the limitations of judicial review in prejudicing foreign tax investigations.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Registrar's Appeal allowed in part and Summons allowed in part.

1.3 Case Type

Tax

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court reviews Comptroller's decision to disclose banking info to Korea, addressing judicial review and international tax cooperation.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Comptroller of Income TaxRespondentGovernment AgencySummons allowed in partPartial
Pang Mei Yu of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Patrick Nai of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
AXYApplicantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
AXZApplicantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
AYAApplicantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
AYBApplicantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Edmund LeowJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Pang Mei YuInland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Patrick NaiInland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Melanie HoWongPartnership LLP
Charmaine NeoWongPartnership LLP
Jocelyn NgiamWongPartnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. The National Tax Service of the Republic of Korea (NTS) requested information from the Comptroller of Income Tax in Singapore regarding the applicants' banking activity.
  2. The request was made under s 105D of the Income Tax Act and Article 25 of the Singapore-Korea Double Taxation Agreement.
  3. The applicants, Korean nationals, sought judicial review of the Comptroller's decision to issue notices to Singaporean banks for their banking information.
  4. The applicants applied for discovery of documents related to the Comptroller's decision.
  5. The Comptroller initially objected to the production of NTS documents based on confidentiality requests.
  6. NTS later consented to the disclosure of redacted copies of NTS-related documents.
  7. The court ordered the disclosure of certain documents, including the request from NTS and correspondence between NTS and the Comptroller.

5. Formal Citations

  1. AXY and others v Comptroller of Income Tax, , [2015] SGHC 291

6. Timeline

DateEvent
National Tax Service of the Republic of Korea issued a request to the Comptroller of Income Tax in Singapore for information on the applicants’ banking activity in Singapore.
The Comptroller filed the affidavit of Ms Wai Yean Tze and served it on the applicants.
The applicants filed Summons No [W] for leave to use and refer to exhibits.
The Comptroller filed a fresh affidavit of Ms Wai Yean Tze.
The government of Singapore and the government of the United States signed an intergovernmental agreement to facilitate the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act in Singapore.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Judicial Review of Comptroller's Decision
    • Outcome: The court determined the scope of discovery necessary for the judicial review, balancing taxpayer rights with the need to avoid prejudicing foreign tax investigations.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Scope of Discovery in Judicial Review
      • Independence of Comptroller's Discretion
  2. Exchange of Information
    • Outcome: The court considered Singapore's obligations under the Double Taxation Agreement with Korea regarding the exchange of information.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Treaty Obligations
      • Confidentiality of Information

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Prohibition Order
  2. Quashing Order

9. Cause of Actions

  • Judicial Review

10. Practice Areas

  • Tax Litigation
  • International Tax Cooperation
  • Exchange of Information

11. Industries

  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
ABU v Comptroller of Income TaxHigh CourtYes[2015] 2 SLR 420SingaporeCited regarding the extent of the court's review of a request from a foreign tax authority.
Breezeway Overseas Ltd and another v UBS AG and othersHigh CourtYes[2012] 4 SLR 1035SingaporeCited for the principle of balancing justice and efficiency in the discovery process.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore
Banking Act (Cap 19, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Trust Companies Act (Cap 336, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Exchange of Information
  • Judicial Review
  • Double Taxation Agreement
  • Tax Evasion
  • Comptroller of Income Tax
  • National Tax Service
  • Discovery
  • Confidentiality
  • Tax Investigation

15.2 Keywords

  • Tax
  • Exchange of Information
  • Singapore
  • Korea
  • Judicial Review
  • International Tax

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Tax
  • International Tax
  • Exchange of Information
  • Judicial Review