Michael Khoo Kah Lip

Michael Khoo Kah Lip is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and partnership law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and partnership law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal representatives	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Leasing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Khoo Kah Lip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Khoo Kah Lip has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Khoo & Partners	4 cases	67% of cases	Chye Seng Kait v Chye Seng Fong: Estate Administration, Resulting Trust, and Executor's Duties(Sep 2021) Lim Hsi-Wei Marc v Orix Capital: Authority of Partner & Liability for Law Firm Debt(Jun 2010) Orix Capital Ltd v Lim Chor Pee Estate: Lease Agreement, Repudiation & Moneylenders Act(Sep 2009)
Michael Khoo & Partners LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	PP v Kong Swee Eng: Corruption Charges & Special Relationship Defence in Jurong Shipyard Case(Jan 2022)
Goh Aik Leng & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pius Gilbert Louis: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Sentencing Powers(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Khoo Kah Lip's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Khoo Kah Lip's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	31,500.00	10,500.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Kong Swee Eng: Corruption Charges & Special Relationship Defence in Jurong Shipyard Case 12 Jan 2022 Kong Swee Eng (Respondent)Lost	12 Jan 2022	Kong Swee Eng (Respondent): Conviction on Several ChargesConvicted on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 11th charges. Appeal dismissed as regards the 7th and 10th charges.
2	Chye Seng Kait v Chye Seng Fong: Estate Administration, Resulting Trust, and Executor's Duties 07 Sep 2021 Chye Seng Fong (executor and trustee of the estate of Chye You, deceased) (Respondent, Defendant)Won	07 Sep 2021	Chye Seng Fong (executor and trustee of the estate of Chye You, deceased) (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the appellant is to pay $31,500 to the respondent as costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lim Hsi-Wei Marc v Orix Capital: Authority of Partner & Liability for Law Firm Debt 27 Jun 2010 Rebecca Marie Stephanie Tai-Yeo Hsiu Erh (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2010	Rebecca Marie Stephanie Tai-Yeo Hsiu Erh (Respondent): Claim dismissedClaim against Rebecca Marie Stephanie Tai-Yeo Hsiu Erh dismissed with costs.
4	Orix Capital Ltd v Lim Chor Pee Estate: Lease Agreement, Repudiation & Moneylenders Act 06 Sep 2009 Rebecca Marie Stephanie Tai-Yeo Hsiu Erh (Defendant)Dismissed	06 Sep 2009	Rebecca Marie Stephanie Tai-Yeo Hsiu Erh (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the third defendant is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Chye Guan Charles v Public Prosecutor: Computer Misuse Act & Sentencing Appeal 25 May 2009 Tan Chye Guan Charles (Appellant)Lost	25 May 2009	Tan Chye Guan Charles (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence of three weeks imprisonment and a $5,000 fine was dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Pius Gilbert Louis: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Sentencing Powers 21 Aug 2003 Pius Gilbert Louis (Respondent)Won	21 Aug 2003	Pius Gilbert Louis (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe court's decision effectively meant that the original sentence enhancement by the High Court was not valid, as it exceeded the permissible limit under the law.