Michael Low

Michael Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Low has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Low has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Crossbows LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	TPY v TPZ: Division of Matrimonial Assets Appeal - Indirect Contributions & Adverse Inference(Jan 2017) BGT v BGU: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute(Feb 2013)
J Koh & Co	2 cases	50% of cases	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Appeal on Registrar's Directions in Construction Dispute(Sep 2001) L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Vacation of Trial Dates Pending Appeal(Sep 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TPY v TPZ: Division of Matrimonial Assets Appeal - Indirect Contributions & Adverse Inference 17 Jan 2017 TPZ (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	17 Jan 2017	TPZ (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount awarded.
2	BGT v BGU: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute 26 Feb 2013 BGU (Defendant)Partial	26 Feb 2013	BGU (Defendant): Equal division of matrimonial assetsRequired to pay $386,721.15 to the wife to equalize the assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Appeal on Registrar's Directions in Construction Dispute 27 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Vacation of Trial Dates Pending Appeal 27 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.