Michael Moey

Michael Moey is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and construction law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Moey has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Events Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chinese Customary Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legitimacy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Sub-Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Moey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Moey has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Moey & Yuen	5 cases	71% of cases	The Audience Motivation Company Asia Pte Ltd v AMC Live Group China (S) Pte Ltd: Trademark Infringement and Passing Off(Mar 2015) Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dissolution, Estate Claims & Property Proceeds Dispute(Feb 2013) Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases(Aug 2007)
Chung & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	New Civilbuild v Guobena: Costs Allocation After Judgment on Progress Payments and Liquidated Damages(Mar 2000) New Civilbuild v Guobena: Res Judicata, Performance Bonds & Building Sub-Contracts(Feb 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Moey's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.7
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Neutral	212.3 parties avg	12.3	29%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Won	28.0 parties avg	8.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	47.4 parties avg	7.4
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Moey's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	2(29%)	29%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 121	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Audience Motivation Company Asia Pte Ltd v AMC Live Group China (S) Pte Ltd: Trademark Infringement and Passing Off 19 Mar 2015 The Audience Motivation Company Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Mar 2015	The Audience Motivation Company Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims of trademark infringement and passing off were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dissolution, Estate Claims & Property Proceeds Dispute 12 Feb 2013 Chiam Heng Chow (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2013	Chiam Heng Chow (Defendant): Claims against first defendant struck offClaims against the first defendant were struck off.
3	Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases 20 Aug 2007 Chiam Heng Tin (Defendant)Neutral	20 Aug 2007	Chiam Heng Tin (Defendant): NeutralAgreed to the sale of the Property with vacant possession if fair compensation was paid to MHP (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Wong Kai Woon v Wong Kong Hom: Determining Beneficiaries of a Will Trust 29 Aug 2000 Wong Kai Woon alias Wong Kai Boon (Plaintiff)Neutral	29 Aug 2000	Wong Kai Woon alias Wong Kai Boon (Plaintiff): NeutralThe judgment concerns the determination of beneficiaries of a will trust. The outcome for Wong Kai Woon is neutral in the sense that the court's decision clarifies the distribution of the estate, but does not directly result in a win or loss for this party.
5	Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act 18 Jul 2000 Ng Yik Soon Richard (Defendant, Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2000	Ng Yik Soon Richard (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the seventh defendant was dismissed as vexatious and an abuse of process. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	New Civilbuild v Guobena: Costs Allocation After Judgment on Progress Payments and Liquidated Damages 23 Mar 2000 Guobena Sendirian Berhad (Defendant)Partial	23 Mar 2000	Guobena Sendirian Berhad (Defendant): Counterclaim successfulGuobena's counterclaim was successful. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	New Civilbuild v Guobena: Res Judicata, Performance Bonds & Building Sub-Contracts 28 Feb 2000 Guobena Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Partial	28 Feb 2000	Guobena Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Counterclaim Partly AllowedGuobena's counterclaim against New Civilbuild is allowed in respect of the expenses incurred or the advances made, on behalf of New Civilbuild. The exact monetary amount will be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.