Michelle Lu

Michelle Lu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michelle Lu has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michelle Lu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michelle Lu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	100% of cases	BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child(Mar 2020) Loy Zhong Huan Dylan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Reformative Training for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt(Dec 2019) PP v Andi Ashwar & Ors: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michelle Lu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michelle Lu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child 22 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
2	Loy Zhong Huan Dylan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Reformative Training for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt 03 Dec 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Dec 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training.
3	PP v Andi Ashwar & Ors: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	26 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialConviction of Andi Ashwar and Mohd Akebal as charged. Conviction of Mohammed Rusli Bin Abdul Rahman on amended charge.
4	Public Prosecutor v Shah Putra bin Samsuddin: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Prosecution successfully convicted the defendant.
5	PP v Tan Kay Yong: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused.
6	Gopu Jaya Raman v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Feb 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Feb 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction.