BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child

BRJ appealed to the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore against the sentence imposed by the High Court for two charges of outrage of modesty of a person under 14 years of age. The High Court sentenced BRJ to 18 months’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane for the first offence, and to 30 months’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane for the second offence, to run consecutively. The Court of Appeal, comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JA, and Chao Hick Tin SJ, dismissed the appeal, finding the sentence of 30 months' imprisonment for the second offence justifiable and not manifestly excessive, given the serious nature of the sexual abuse and multiple aggravating factors.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex tempore judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against sentence for outrage of modesty of a child. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the sentence justifiable given the serious sexual abuse.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Eugene Lee of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Michelle Lu of Attorney-General’s Chambers
BRJAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeYes
Steven ChongJudge of AppealNo
Chao Hick TinSenior JudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Eugene LeeAttorney-General’s Chambers
Michelle LuAttorney-General’s Chambers
Peter Keith FernandoLeo Fernando LLC
Kavita PandeyLeo Fernando LLC
Renuga Devi SivaramLeo Fernando LLC

4. Facts

  1. The appellant pleaded guilty to two charges of outrage of modesty of a person under 14 years of age.
  2. The victim was a ten-year-old girl.
  3. The second offence occurred on 1 December 2017.
  4. The appellant gained entry to the victim's house using a key entrusted to his family.
  5. The appellant watched pornographic videos with the victim and then undressed her.
  6. The appellant licked and touched the victim's nipples and touched her vulva.
  7. The appellant rubbed his penis against the victim's vagina and ejaculated on her vulva.

5. Formal Citations

  1. BRJ v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Appeal No 33 of 2019, [2020] SGCA 21

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Second offence of outrage of modesty occurred.
Judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal

7. Legal Issues

  1. Manifest Excessiveness of Sentence
    • Outcome: The court held that the sentence was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and the sentencing framework.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2018] 3 SLR 1048
  2. Application of Sentencing Framework
    • Outcome: The court found that the sentencing framework was correctly applied and the offence fell within Band 3.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2018] 3 SLR 1048

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Outrage of Modesty

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals
  • Sentencing Guidelines

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
GBR v Public Prosecutor and another appealHigh CourtYes[2018] 3 SLR 1048SingaporeEstablished the sentencing framework used to determine the appropriate sentence for outrage of modesty offences.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 354(2)Singapore
Penal Code s 293Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Outrage of Modesty
  • Sentencing Framework
  • Aggravating Factors
  • Manifestly Excessive
  • Sexual Abuse
  • Premeditation
  • Abuse of Trust

15.2 Keywords

  • Criminal Appeal
  • Outrage of Modesty
  • Sentencing
  • Singapore Law
  • Child Abuse

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Sexual Offences