Morris John

Morris John is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Morris John has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Morris John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Morris John has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Robertson Quay Investment v Steen Consultants: Delay Damages & Interest(Feb 2008)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Will and Codicil of Tan Tye: Interpretation of 'Male Issue' in Will(May 2004)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	33% of cases	Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd: Passing Off & Goodwill in Retail Business(Apr 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Morris John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Morris John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Robertson Quay Investment v Steen Consultants: Delay Damages & Interest 28 Feb 2008 Shahbaz Ahmad (Respondent)Won	28 Feb 2008	Shahbaz Ahmad (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs, and with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Re Will and Codicil of Tan Tye: Interpretation of 'Male Issue' in Will 20 May 2004 Applicants (Applicant)Partial	20 May 2004	Applicants (Applicant): Application partially successfulApplication to determine the beneficiaries of the estate corpus was partially successful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd: Passing Off & Goodwill in Retail Business 11 Apr 2000 S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP) (Respondent)Lost	11 Apr 2000	S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP) (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe respondent's claim was dismissed, and the injunction was lifted.