N K Rajarh

N K Rajarh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 4% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

N K Rajarh has demonstrated expertise across 71 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	13 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fire Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fire Safety Regulations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance of Fire Protection Systems	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Import Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N K Rajarh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

N K Rajarh has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	8 cases	35% of cases	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy(Sep 2019) PP v Saridewi & Haikal: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2018) NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation(Sep 2018)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	4 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2022) PP v Gunasilan Rajenthiran: Drug Importation, Misuse of Drugs Act, Voluntariness of Statements(Jul 2021) Pollmann v Ye: Damages Assessment for Personal Injuries from Road Accident(Apr 2021)
M Rama Law Corporation	4 cases	17% of cases	Union Concept Manufacturers v Rhythme Technology: Negligence Claim for Fire Damage Due to Faulty Fire Hose Reel(May 2015) Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement After Plaintiff's Death(Jul 2014) Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Offer to Settle & Impact of Plaintiff's Death on Damages(Sep 2013)
N K Rajarh	4 cases	17% of cases	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2006) PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2005) Public Prosecutor v. Siew Boon Loong: Appeal Against Sentence for Criminal Breach of Trust(Jan 2005)
Rajah Velu & Co	2 cases	9% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Thamayanthi: Culpable Homicide, Intention to Cause Injury, and Sufficiency of Evidence(Dec 2001) PP v Loganatha Venkatesan: Murder Conspiracy & Abetment Case(Mar 2000)
Damodara Ong LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	PP v Muhammad Hanafi & Mohamed Nagib: Trafficking Diamorphine & Cannabis(Dec 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of N K Rajarh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	162.7 parties avg	2.7	70%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	13%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of N K Rajarh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	16(70%)	70%
Partial	3(13%)	13%
Won	4(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	14,652,907.42	2,093,272.497 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Muhammad Hanafi & Mohamed Nagib: Trafficking Diamorphine & Cannabis 15 Dec 2024 Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip (Defendant)Lost	15 Dec 2024	Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted on charges of possessing diamorphine and cannabis for trafficking.
2	Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Feb 2022 Jeganathan Balan (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2022	Jeganathan Balan (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedConvicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane.
3	PP v Gunasilan Rajenthiran: Drug Importation, Misuse of Drugs Act, Voluntariness of Statements 06 Jul 2021 Gunasilan Rajenthiran (Defendant)Lost	06 Jul 2021	Gunasilan Rajenthiran (Defendant): Conviction and Sentence UpheldThe accused's conviction for importing cannabis and sentence of life imprisonment and caning were upheld.
4	Pollmann v Ye: Damages Assessment for Personal Injuries from Road Accident 25 Apr 2021 Christian Joachim Pollmann (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2021	Christian Joachim Pollmann (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTotal damages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $13,660,183.05 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application 29 Apr 2020 GVR Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Apr 2020	GVR Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for an indefinite stay of the winding-up order was dismissed.
6	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy 23 Sep 2019 Parthiban Kanapathy (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2019	Parthiban Kanapathy (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of importing not less than 14.99g of diamorphine.
7	PP v Saridewi & Haikal: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2018 Saridewi Binte Djamani (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2018	Saridewi Binte Djamani (Defendant): Convicted of drug traffickingSaridewi was found guilty of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
8	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation 04 Sep 2018 NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant)Partial	04 Sep 2018	NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements, and 60% of its costs below, assessed on a standard basis, to be taxed on the District Court scale if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	DNKH Logistics Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd: Fire Insurance Policy Coverage Dispute 23 Aug 2018 DNKH Logistics Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	23 Aug 2018	DNKH Logistics Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; costs of $5500 inclusive of disbursements ordered in favour of Liberty Insurance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Economic Loss 18 Jul 2018 NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant)Partial	18 Jul 2018	NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; judgment for the appellant in the amount of $176,176.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence & Pure Economic Loss Claim at Changi Airport 08 Oct 2017 NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Oct 2017	NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed as the court found that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff.
12	Public Prosecutor v Sibeko Lindiwe Mary-Jane: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Sep 2016 Sibeko Lindiwe Mary-Jane (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2016	Sibeko Lindiwe Mary-Jane (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of importing controlled drugs.
13	Sun Delong v Teo Poh Soon: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries from Traffic Accident 06 Jul 2016 Teo Poh Soon (Defendant)Lost	06 Jul 2016	Teo Poh Soon (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDefendant is liable for 50% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff, amounting to S$93,169.32. This amount is in Singapore Dollars (SGD) as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Union Concept Manufacturers v Rhythme Technology: Negligence Claim for Fire Damage Due to Faulty Fire Hose Reel 03 May 2015 P & K Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	03 May 2015	P & K Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages due to the defendant's negligence was dismissed.
15	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement After Plaintiff's Death 23 Jul 2014 Teo Gim Tiong (Appellant, Defendant)Won	23 Jul 2014	Teo Gim Tiong (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court held that the victim's mother had no capacity to accept the offer.
16	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Offer to Settle & Impact of Plaintiff's Death on Damages 16 Sep 2013 Teo Gim Tiong (Appellant)Lost	16 Sep 2013	Teo Gim Tiong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed.
17	Yong Sheng Goldsmith v Liberty Insurance: Summary Judgment for Insurance Claim Dispute over Armed Robbery 23 Jun 2011 Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Jun 2011	Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Leave to defend grantedDefendant granted leave to defend upon condition that the defendant pays into court, or provides security by way of a banker’s guarantee, 70% of the sum of S$857,441.25 (ie the sum of $600,208.88), by 8 July 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Mar 2006 Okeke Nelson Malachy (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2006	Okeke Nelson Malachy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for conspiracy to import controlled drugs dismissed.
19	PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Dec 2005 Okeke Nelson Malachy (Defendant)Lost	21 Dec 2005	Okeke Nelson Malachy (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of conspiracy to import controlled drugs.
20	Public Prosecutor v. Siew Boon Loong: Appeal Against Sentence for Criminal Breach of Trust 30 Jan 2005 Siew Boon Loong (Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2005	Siew Boon Loong (Respondent): Sentence UpheldThe respondent's original sentence of six weeks' imprisonment was upheld.
21	Public Prosecutor v Arun Prakash Vaithilingam: Murder, Sudden Fight Exception 09 Dec 2002 Arun Prakash Vaithilingam (Defendant)Lost	09 Dec 2002	Arun Prakash Vaithilingam (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
22	Public Prosecutor v Thamayanthi: Culpable Homicide, Intention to Cause Injury, and Sufficiency of Evidence 13 Dec 2001 Thamayanthi (Defendant)Won	13 Dec 2001	Thamayanthi (Defendant): Not guilty of murderAccused found not guilty of murder.
23	PP v Loganatha Venkatesan: Murder Conspiracy & Abetment Case 13 Mar 2000 Chandran s/o Rajagopal (Defendant)Lost	13 Mar 2000	Chandran s/o Rajagopal (Defendant): Accused found guiltyAccused sentenced to death.