N Kanagavijayan

N Kanagavijayan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of main contract terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Application for Adjournment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Matters	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of back-to-back provision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undercover Operations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Renovation Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Kanagavijayan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

N Kanagavijayan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kana & Co	12 cases	63% of cases	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal(Aug 2018) Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate(Feb 2015) Mas Swan v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Drug Importation & Inconsistent Defenses(May 2012)
Kana and Co	2 cases	11% of cases	Luk Yue Hong Yvonne v Lim Seng Leong: Minority Oppression under Companies Act(May 2005) Sulochana v Rajalakshmi: Criminal Defamation & Voluntarily Causing Hurt Appeal(Nov 2003)
K Krishna & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements(Aug 2000)
M/S Kana & Co	1 cases	5% of cases	Macly Assets v Loke Yew Kong: Breach of Contract and Renovation Dispute(Jul 2014)
A Mohamed Hashim and Madelene Sng	1 cases	5% of cases	Khng Thian Huat v Riduan bin Yusof: Tenancy Dispute over Property Condition and Costs Allocation(Oct 2004)
N Krishna & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	PP v Muhamad Hasik: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly & Secret Societies(May 2002)
Krishna & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	PP v Muhammad Ali Hashim: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of N Kanagavijayan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	26%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	11%
Partial	62.7 parties avg	2.7	32%
Won	63.0 parties avg	3.0	32%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of N Kanagavijayan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	5(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(10%)	10%
Partial	6(30%)	30%
Won	6(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	252,722.18	50,544.445 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal 01 Aug 2018 Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Appellant)Neutral	01 Aug 2018	Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Appellant): Appeal AdjournedAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018.
2	Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate 03 Feb 2015 BUTHMANABAN S/O VAITHILINGAM (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Feb 2015	BUTHMANABAN S/O VAITHILINGAM (Plaintiff): Beneficial interest awardedPlaintiff was awarded 21.43% of the net sale proceeds of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Macly Assets v Loke Yew Kong: Breach of Contract and Renovation Dispute 14 Jul 2014 Macly Assets Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	14 Jul 2014	Macly Assets Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages due to breach of contract was dismissed.
4	Mas Swan v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Drug Importation & Inconsistent Defenses 13 May 2012 Mas Swan bin Adnan (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	13 May 2012	Mas Swan bin Adnan (Respondent, Appellant): ConvictedConvicted of attempted importation of ecstasy.
5	ASM v ASN: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody and Maintenance Dispute 31 Jan 2012 ASN (Respondent)Partial	31 Jan 2012	ASN (Respondent): Orders variedOrders varied regarding division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance.
6	Public Prosecutor v AFR: Culpable Homicide and Child Abuse Sentencing 26 May 2011 AFR (Respondent)Lost	26 May 2011	AFR (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced from six years' imprisonment to ten years' imprisonment, plus ten strokes of the cane.
7	AQR v AQS: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Post-Divorce 26 May 2011 AQR (Plaintiff)Won	26 May 2011	AQR (Plaintiff): Orders made in his favorOrders made in his favor, including the transfer of properties and custody arrangements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor: Common Intention, Murder, and Robbery 23 May 2011 Galing Anak Kujat (Appellant)Partial	23 May 2011	Galing Anak Kujat (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartGaling's appeal was allowed in part; his murder conviction was substituted with a conviction for robbery with hurt.
9	PP v Mas Swan: Drug Importation, Wilful Blindness & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2011 Mas Swan bin Adnan (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2011	Mas Swan bin Adnan (Defendant): AcquittedCharge against Mas Swan not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; acquitted.
10	Kor Beng Shien v Lee Poh Lee: Estate Claim Over Transcrane Services & Resulting Trust Dispute 24 Nov 2009 Ngai Wern Lin (Plaintiff)Won	24 Nov 2009	Ngai Wern Lin (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; Lee must account to the plaintiffs for Transcrane’s profits as from 23 August 2005. The amount due to the plaintiffs will be assessed by the Registrar. The plaintiffs are also entitled to possession of the heavy vehicles claimed by them and to damages if the said vehicles are not delivered. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Jaya Sarana Engineering v GIB Automation: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Sub-Contract 19 May 2009 GIB Automation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	19 May 2009	GIB Automation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Successful in partGIB was able to set off $173,530.75 as the cost of Tay’s workers during the relevant period against the amount that it owes to JSE. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	GIB Automation v Deluge Fire Protection: Sub-Contract Terms & Breach 01 Apr 2007 GIB Automation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	01 Apr 2007	GIB Automation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff for wrongful termination, with damages to be assessed.Interlocutory judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff for wrongful termination, with damages to be assessed. Monetary amount will be determined at a later assessment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Ari bin Abdullah v Ong Chwee Siew: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Admissibility of Criminal Conviction in Civil Proceedings 28 Jan 2007 Ari bin Abdullah (by his committee of person and estate, Sariah bte Tarmon and another) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jan 2007	Ari bin Abdullah (by his committee of person and estate, Sariah bte Tarmon and another) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Luk Yue Hong Yvonne v Lim Seng Leong: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 05 May 2005 Png Raymond (Defendant)Won	05 May 2005	Png Raymond (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe originating summons was dismissed with costs to the defendant.
15	Khng Thian Huat v Riduan bin Yusof: Tenancy Dispute over Property Condition and Costs Allocation 20 Oct 2004 Sa'adiah binte Mohamed Shaffi (Defendant)Neutral	20 Oct 2004	Sa'adiah binte Mohamed Shaffi (Defendant): NeutralDamages were not awarded against the second defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Sulochana v Rajalakshmi: Criminal Defamation & Voluntarily Causing Hurt Appeal 27 Nov 2003 Sulochana d/o Tambiah Dirumala Sakkrawarthi (Appellant)Lost	27 Nov 2003	Sulochana d/o Tambiah Dirumala Sakkrawarthi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSulochana's appeals against both her conviction and sentence were dismissed.
17	PP v Muhamad Hasik: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly & Secret Societies 12 May 2002 Muhamad Hasik bin Sahar (Defendant)Lost	12 May 2002	Muhamad Hasik bin Sahar (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with 16 strokes of the cane.
18	PP v Muhammad Ali Hashim: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2001 Muhammad Naveed (Defendant)Won	20 Apr 2001	Muhammad Naveed (Defendant): AcquittedAcquitted of the charge of trafficking in a controlled drug due to reasonable doubt.
19	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements 14 Aug 2000 Loganatha Venkatesan (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2000	Loganatha Venkatesan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was dismissed.