N. Srinivasan

N. Srinivasan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in measure of damages and workplace accident. Their track record shows a 62.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

N. Srinivasan has demonstrated expertise across 63 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	18 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Negligence	11 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Risk Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provisional Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employer's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Principles governing extension of time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Independent Contractor Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Pass	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cervical Whiplash	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employers’ duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Phantom Limb Pain	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inconsiderate Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N. Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

N. Srinivasan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	19 cases	90% of cases	Tan Chee Heong v Chen Hua: District Court Jurisdiction & Abandonment of Excess Claim(May 2023) Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat: Damages for Personal Injuries from Traffic Accident(May 2016) Chong Kim Beng v Lim Ka Poh: Joint Liability & Negligence in Workplace Injury(Apr 2015)
Hoh & Partners	2 cases	10% of cases	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute(Feb 2003) Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury on Circular Road(Nov 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of N. Srinivasan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	19%
Partial	42.5 parties avg	2.5	19%
Won	132.5 parties avg	2.5	62%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	72.4 parties avg	2.4
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of N. Srinivasan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(19%)	19%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	13(62%)	62%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	733,177.11	56,398.2413 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	7 223	Lost: 2 cases (28.6%) Partial: 2 cases (28.6%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Chee Heong v Chen Hua: District Court Jurisdiction & Abandonment of Excess Claim 03 May 2023 Chen Hua (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	03 May 2023	Chen Hua (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) awarded to the respondent.
2	Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat: Damages for Personal Injuries from Traffic Accident 12 May 2016 Quek Yen Fei Kenneth (Plaintiff)Won	12 May 2016	Quek Yen Fei Kenneth (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $452,509.41 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chong Kim Beng v Lim Ka Poh: Joint Liability & Negligence in Workplace Injury 05 Apr 2015 Chong Kim Beng (Appellant)Lost	05 Apr 2015	Chong Kim Beng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each side to bear his/its own costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lum Hon Ying v Buildmart Industries: Negligence & Statutory Duty in Crane Accident 09 Jul 2014 Lum Hon Ying (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2014	Lum Hon Ying (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
5	Lam Hwa Engineering v Yang Qiang: Recovery of Travel Expenses as Disbursements in Personal Injury Claim 13 Jan 2014 Yang Qiang (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2014	Yang Qiang (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe respondent's claim for travel expenses was upheld, and the appellant was ordered to pay costs.
6	Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat: Motorcycle-Taxi Collision Liability Dispute 14 Jul 2013 Quek Yen Fei Kenneth (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jul 2013	Quek Yen Fei Kenneth (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed by the registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Ng Chee Wee v Tan Chin Seng: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries 27 Feb 2013 Ng Chee Wee (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	27 Feb 2013	Ng Chee Wee (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; multiplicand for pre-trial loss of earnings and loss of future earnings varied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Xuyi Building Engineering Co v Li Aidong: Employee Claims for Unpaid Wages and Overtime 16 Aug 2010 Li Aidong (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	16 Aug 2010	Li Aidong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe court found that the employees' payment system was time-based, entitling them to additional payments, but also ruled that Xuyi's failure to comply with the Employment Act allowed the employees to terminate their employment without notice. The court ordered payments to be computed at a rate of $2.50 per hour. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	ACD v See Mun Li: Provisional Damages for Head Injuries in Child Road Accident 24 Sep 2009 ACD (by her next friend B) (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Sep 2009	ACD (by her next friend B) (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiff with a provisional order for damagesJudgment for the plaintiff for immediate damages in the sum of $132,409 (being 65% of the total amount of $203,705), on the assumption that the plaintiff would not develop sexual hormonal deficiency leading to her inability to reach spontaneous puberty (the specific contingency). If the plaintiff does at a future date develop the specific contingency, she shall be entitled to make an application for further damages. Such application shall be made within 5 years of this order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Ma HongFei v U-Hin Manufacturing: Negligence & Occupier's Liability in Workplace Injury 29 Jul 2009 Ma HongFei (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jul 2009	Ma HongFei (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment awarded against the second defendant. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Zheng San Gen v OGG Landscape: Security for Costs in Negligence Claim 26 May 2009 Zheng San Gen (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	26 May 2009	Zheng San Gen (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; ordered to furnish security for costs in the amount of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Goh Pin Yi Cindy v Mahmod Fadzuli: Negligence Claim for Bicycle Accident Involving Parked Lorry 19 Apr 2009 Goh Pin Yi Cindy (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Apr 2009	Goh Pin Yi Cindy (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff for damages to be assessed on the basis that she will be entitled to recover one-third of the damages so assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Chua Jia Yan Emily v See Mun Li: Assessment of Damages for Head Injuries and Growth Hormone Deficiency 01 Feb 2009 Chua Jia Yan Emily (by her next friend Chua Kiaw Swan) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	01 Feb 2009	Chua Jia Yan Emily (by her next friend Chua Kiaw Swan) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal to adduce further medical evidence was dismissed.
14	Liu Haixiang v China Construction: Damages for Work Injury & Loss of Earnings 18 Jan 2009 Liu Haixiang (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	18 Jan 2009	Liu Haixiang (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; award for loss of earning capacity set aside and replaced with an award for loss of future earnings in the sum of $60,144 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Ng Chan Teng v Keppel Singmarine: Transfer of Damages Assessment to High Court 12 Jan 2009 Ng Chan Teng (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jan 2009	Ng Chan Teng (Plaintiff): Application allowedThe plaintiff's application to transfer the action from the District Court to the High Court was allowed.
16	Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Contributory Negligence and District Court Jurisdictional Limit 12 Mar 2008 Ng Chan Teng (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	12 Mar 2008	Ng Chan Teng (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe appeal was upheld, meaning Ng Chan Teng can recover damages up to the District Court's jurisdictional limit after deductions for contributory negligence. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
17	Poh Kwee Eng v Hua Goi Co.: Employer's Duty of Care and Statutory Obligations under Factories Act 20 Dec 2006 Poh Kwee Eng (Plaintiff)Won	20 Dec 2006	Poh Kwee Eng (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
18	China Construction v Shao Hai: Employer's Duty of Care & Workplace Safety 22 Mar 2004 Shao Hai (Respondent)Lost	22 Mar 2004	Shao Hai (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; original judgment set aside. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
19	Zhao Feng Guo v Tan Hong Soon: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 16 Jun 2003 Zhao Feng Guo (Plaintiff)Won	16 Jun 2003	Zhao Feng Guo (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; total amount awarded is $70,114.70 (Singapore Dollars).
20	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute 23 Feb 2003 Hua Sheng Tao (Plaintiff)Won	23 Feb 2003	Hua Sheng Tao (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedPlaintiff does not require leave to appeal and that his Notice of Appeal filed on 10 September 2002 be proceeded with. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury on Circular Road 18 Nov 2002 Zhang Wan Bo (Plaintiff)Won	18 Nov 2002	Zhang Wan Bo (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; monetary amount not specified in the judgment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).