Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury on Circular Road

In Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong and Poh Choon Ann (Pte) Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard a negligence claim. The plaintiff, Zhang Wan Bo, sued Poh Kay Leong, the driver, and Poh Choon Ann (Pte) Ltd, the employer of the driver, for injuries sustained when he was hit by a car driven by Poh Kay Leong on Circular Road. The claim against Poh Choon Ann (Pte) Ltd was withdrawn. The court found Poh Kay Leong solely liable for the accident and ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

High Court case regarding a negligence claim where the plaintiff was injured by the defendant's car while walking on Circular Road. The court found the defendant solely liable.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Zhang Wan BoPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Poh Kay LeongDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Poh Choon Ann (Pte) LtdDefendantCorporationAction WithdrawnWithdrawn

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was hit by a car driven by the first defendant while walking on Circular Road.
  2. The first defendant was reversing his car into a parking lot when the accident occurred.
  3. The plaintiff sustained a cervical whiplash which caused him to become paralysed.
  4. The first defendant was convicted of driving without due care and attention under the Road Traffic Act.
  5. The plaintiff and his wife were walking abreast of each other when the accident occurred.
  6. The plaintiff initially claimed he was walking against the flow of traffic.
  7. The plaintiff's wife and friend testified that the plaintiff was on the left side of the road before the accident.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong and Another, Suit 1442/2001, [2002] SGHC 274

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff arrived in Singapore.
Plaintiff was knocked down by a car.
Plaintiff commenced action for damages.
First defendant was found guilty of driving without due care and attention.
Trial commenced.
Judgment was given in favour of the plaintiff.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the first defendant negligent in driving without due care and attention, leading to the injury of the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Contributory Negligence
    • Outcome: The court rejected the argument that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Road Traffic ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Negligence
  • Cervical Whiplash
  • Circular Road
  • Reversing
  • Due Care and Attention
  • Contributory Negligence

15.2 Keywords

  • Negligence
  • Personal Injury
  • Road Accident
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Pedestrian
  • Circular Road

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Road Accidents