Nandakumar Ponniya Servai

Nandakumar Ponniya Servai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fair Hearing Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disobedience of order of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nandakumar Ponniya Servai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	11 cases	100% of cases	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal(Jan 2025) CYE v CYF: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Energy Trading Dispute(Sep 2023) CZO v CZP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nandakumar Ponniya Servai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	36%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	18%
Won	53.3 parties avg	3.3	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nandakumar Ponniya Servai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(36%)	36%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Won	5(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	342,843.12	48,977.597 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal 15 Jan 2025 UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	15 Jan 2025	UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Appellant): Application DismissedAdmission application dismissed with costs of $8,000 all-in. Costs to be borne by UTSS. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CYE v CYF: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Energy Trading Dispute 28 Sep 2023 CYF (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2023	CYF (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for unpaid storage fees was allowed in the arbitration.
3	CZO v CZP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 27 Aug 2023 CZP (Respondent, Claimant)Won	27 Aug 2023	CZP (Respondent, Claimant): Judgment for RespondentThe application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and the respondent was awarded costs of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Mittal v Westbridge Ventures: Arbitrability of Oppression Claims & Anti-Suit Injunction 05 Jan 2023 Anupam Mittal (Appellant)Lost	05 Jan 2023	Anupam Mittal (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Anupam Mittal to pay costs of SGD 100,000 to the respondent.
5	WestBridge Ventures II v. Anupam Mittal: Contempt of Court for Anti-Suit Injunction Disobedience 30 Oct 2022 Anupam Mittal (Defendant)Lost	30 Oct 2022	Anupam Mittal (Defendant): Contempt of CourtFound guilty of contempt of court and fined $70,000, conditional on purging contempt within one month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings v Anupam Mittal: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims 25 Oct 2021 Anupam Mittal (Defendant)Lost	25 Oct 2021	Anupam Mittal (Defendant): Application DismissedPermanent anti-suit injunction granted against the defendant, SUM 1477 dismissed.
7	Mirae Asset Daewoo Co Ltd v Sng Zhiwei Joel: Summary Judgment & Breach of Contract 30 Jun 2021 Mirae Asset Daewoo Co, Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jun 2021	Mirae Asset Daewoo Co, Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff with interest and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	CIK v CIL: Contract Formation & Jurisdictional Objection in Construction Dispute 09 Dec 2020 CIK (Plaintiff)Won	09 Dec 2020	CIK (Plaintiff): Adjudication Determination set asideAdjudication Determination set aside on the ground that there was jurisdiction because a written contract existed. Costs of this originating summons are to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff, fixed at $5,000 all inclusive. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 Senda International Capital Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	11 Mar 2019	Senda International Capital Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim Allowed in PartInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for Senda against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
10	GPE Pte Ltd v Siemens Pte Ltd: Construction Law, Damages for Defects & Delay 05 Sep 2018 Siemens Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	05 Sep 2018	Siemens Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial Judgment for Defendant; Assessment OrderedJudgment for the defendant for liquidated damages for delay and back charges for costs of additional welders and inspections ($37,178.43 + $19,671.69 = $56,843.12); assessment ordered for back charges for rectification costs and damages for delay in completion for the 030 and 103 Projects. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 Yao Jianfang (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2017	Yao Jianfang (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantPlaintiff's application dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay costs of SGD 25,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).