Nandwani Manoj Prakash

Nandwani Manoj Prakash is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated expertise across 101 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-incorporation acts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Negotiations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Consumption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandwani Manoj Prakash has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nandwani Manoj Prakash has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 22 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	22 cases	96% of cases	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Margin Trading, Broker-Dealer Agreements & Investor Claims(Sep 2024) Public Prosecutor v Masri bin Hussain: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2024) PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nandwani Manoj Prakash's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 7 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	122.8 parties avg	2.8	52%
Other	22.5 parties avg	2.5	9%
Partial	43.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	54.8 parties avg	4.8	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2011	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	35.1 parties avg	5.1
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nandwani Manoj Prakash's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(52%)	52%
Other	2(9%)	9%
Partial	4(17%)	17%
Won	5(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	255,000.00	21,250.0012 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 111	Other: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Other: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Margin Trading, Broker-Dealer Agreements & Investor Claims 23 Sep 2024 Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	23 Sep 2024	Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety. Costs awarded in favour of the Respondents on the indemnity basis in the sum of $85,000 all-in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Public Prosecutor v Masri bin Hussain: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Mar 2024 Masri bin Hussain (Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2024	Masri bin Hussain (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
3	PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2023 Teo Yiu Kin Tee (Defendant)Lost	18 Jun 2023	Teo Yiu Kin Tee (Defendant): ConvictionConvicted on the charge of trafficking in diamorphine under s 5(1)(a) read with section 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
4	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant)Other	15 Nov 2022	Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant): Application AllowedAccused allowed to recall Prosecution witnesses and give further evidence.
5	Asia Petworld v Sivabalan: Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy in Pet Supply Industry 25 May 2022 Asia Petworld Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2022	Asia Petworld Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of confidence and conspiracy was dismissed.
6	Ong Chai Soon v Ong Chai Koon: Constructive Trusts & Housing Development Act Interpretation 21 Apr 2022 Ong Soh Ai (Respondent)Won	21 Apr 2022	Ong Soh Ai (Respondent): WonAppeal dismissed; awarded $50,000 in costs from the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tecnomar & Associates v SBM Offshore: Breach of Contract Claim & Material Non-Disclosure in Service Out of Jurisdiction Application 12 Apr 2021 Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	12 Apr 2021	Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with indemnity costs to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Tecnomar v SBM Offshore: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Material Non-Disclosure 10 Nov 2020 Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2020	Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Gabriel Law Corp v H&C S Holdings: Taxation of Costs in Arbitration Enforcement 05 Nov 2020 Gabriel Law Corporation (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2020	Gabriel Law Corporation (Applicant): Review application dismissedLaw Firm's review application dismissed.
10	Andrla v American Express: Bankruptcy Order Appeal & Interim Order Application 17 Mar 2019 DOMINIC ANDRLA (Applicant, Appellant, Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2019	DOMINIC ANDRLA (Applicant, Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeals against the bankruptcy order and the dismissal of his application for an interim order were dismissed.
11	Lalwani Ashok v Lalwani Shalini: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Estate Sums 01 Jan 2019 Malti Gobind Lalwani (Defendant, Respondent)Won	01 Jan 2019	Malti Gobind Lalwani (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Executor required to pay the corrected sum of $425,338.87 within 21 days. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
12	Lalwani Shalini v Lalwani Ashok: Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Estate Administration 23 Apr 2017 Malti Gobind Lalwani (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Apr 2017	Malti Gobind Lalwani (Plaintiff): Account to be takenAccount to be taken of the Estate Account and the monies due to the Estate pursuant to the Schedule of Assets, including, but not limited to the debts owed by Basco, Eltee and Bobby-O; an account to be taken of Bob’s, including but not limited to any dividend payments and interest; an account to be taken of the debt owed by Moti to the Estate; an account to be taken of the Estate’s share in the estate of Lilan.
13	Foo v Tuang: Family Probate Dispute Over Estate Administration 27 Nov 2016 Foo Jhee Tuang (Defendant)Partial	27 Nov 2016	Foo Jhee Tuang (Defendant): Claims dismissed in partClaims against the First Defendant were dismissed in part. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 23 Nov 2016 Jong Hee Sen (Defendant, Appellant)Won	23 Nov 2016	Jong Hee Sen (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, finding that the communications were protected by 'without prejudice' privilege. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan: Sentencing under Misuse of Drugs Act after s 33B Amendment 06 Mar 2016 Chum Tat Suan (Defense)Other	06 Mar 2016	Chum Tat Suan (Defense): Life ImprisonmentThe court exercised its discretion under s 33B of the Act to impose a sentence of life imprisonment instead of the death penalty on Chum. Chum is not liable to be caned because of his age.
16	Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan: Importation of Diamorphine and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act Amendments 08 Jun 2015 Chum Tat Suan (Defendant)Partial	08 Jun 2015	Chum Tat Suan (Defendant): PartialThe court maintained its finding that the accused was only a courier.
17	Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Aug 2013 Chum Tat Suan (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2013	Chum Tat Suan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty of importing diamorphine into Singapore.
18	Centillion v Public Prosecutor: Confiscation Order Appeal Under CDSA 01 Nov 2012 Ung Yoke Hooi (Respondent)Won	01 Nov 2012	Ung Yoke Hooi (Respondent): Application successfulThe court held that all the bank accounts held by UYH are not realisable properties.
19	PP v Ng Teck Lee: CDSA Confiscation Order & Third-Party Interests in Misappropriated Funds 14 Sep 2011 Ung Yoke Hooi (Intervener, Applicant)Won	14 Sep 2011	Ung Yoke Hooi (Intervener, Applicant): Monies in bank accounts declared not realisable propertyThe money in Ung Yoke Hooi's bank accounts was declared not realisable property.
20	Raja Kannappan v Maanvili: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife Maintenance Dispute 04 Jul 2011 Maanvili d/o Jaganathan (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2011	Maanvili d/o Jaganathan (Defendant): Maintenance awardedThe court ordered the husband to pay the wife maintenance at $2,000 per month from October 2005 onwards. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Rajaratnam Kumar v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravana Muthu: Validity of Mutual Wills Dispute 25 May 2010 Rajaratnam Kumar (alias Rajaratnam Vairamuthu) (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2010	Rajaratnam Kumar (alias Rajaratnam Vairamuthu) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim to set aside the fourth wills was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	VisionHealthOne Corp v HD Holdings: Discovery Order Appeal & Locus Standi 11 Mar 2010 Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2010	Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the AR’s order for discovery was dismissed and ordered to pay $3,000 as costs inclusive of disbursements for the entire hearing to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	PP v Aguilar Guen Garlejo: Culpable Homicide, Mental Disorder, and Sentencing 28 May 2006 Aguilar Guen Garlejo (Defendant)Lost	28 May 2006	Aguilar Guen Garlejo (Defendant): LostThe accused was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten years.