Narayanan Vijay Kumar

Narayanan Vijay Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of moratoria	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voyeurism	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fellatio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Preference	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resealing of Foreign Grant	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Narayanan Vijay Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Narayanan Vijay Kumar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vijay & Co	6 cases	86% of cases	Lee Ker Min v Lee Gin Hong: Partnership Dispute, Constructive Trusts, and Fiduciary Duties(Jul 2020) UMM v UML: Appeal Against Setting Aside and Variation of Consent Orders in Divorce Proceedings(Oct 2018) Public Prosecutor v Chua Hock Leong: Enhanced Sentence for Fellatio on a Minor(Jun 2018)
Vijay and Co	1 cases	14% of cases	PP v Chong Hou En: Voyeurism, Mental Disorder & Penal Code s 509 Sentencing(Mar 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Narayanan Vijay Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.4 parties avg	2.4	86%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Narayanan Vijay Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(86%)	86%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,056,949.80	2,764,237.454 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Ker Min v Lee Gin Hong: Partnership Dispute, Constructive Trusts, and Fiduciary Duties 29 Jul 2020 Lee Ker Min (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jul 2020	Lee Ker Min (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for half of the partnership debt was dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UMM v UML: Appeal Against Setting Aside and Variation of Consent Orders in Divorce Proceedings 01 Oct 2018 UMM (Appellant)Lost	01 Oct 2018	UMM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Husband's appeal against the decision of the District Judge to dismiss his application to set aside ancillary orders made by consent was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Chua Hock Leong: Enhanced Sentence for Fellatio on a Minor 25 Jun 2018 Chua Hock Leong (Respondent)Lost	25 Jun 2018	Chua Hock Leong (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced to ten years and six months’ imprisonment with an additional imprisonment term of six months in lieu of caning, making a total of 11 years’ imprisonment.
4	PP v Chong Hou En: Voyeurism, Mental Disorder & Penal Code s 509 Sentencing 15 Mar 2015 Chong Hou En (Respondent)Lost	15 Mar 2015	Chong Hou En (Respondent): Sentence of Probation Substituted with ImprisonmentThe respondent's sentence of probation was substituted with a term of imprisonment of 16 weeks.
5	M+W Singapore v Leow Tet Sin: Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Trading 15 Jan 2015 Yukiyasu Nakagawa (Defendant)Lost	15 Jan 2015	Yukiyasu Nakagawa (Defendant): Claim upheld against DefendantThe court found the defendant liable for dishonest assistance in a breach of trust and inducing a breach of contract, and ordered him to pay $5,348,413.51 jointly and severally with the other defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Soo Yen Sun v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Survivorship Rights in Joint Account Dispute 27 Oct 2009 Soo Yen Sun (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2009	Soo Yen Sun (Plaintiff, Respondent): Claim AllowedDeclaration that Soo Yen Sun is entitled to all monies remaining in the first OCBC account as the sole surviving joint owner of that account (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Amrae Benchuan Trading v Tan Te Teck: Undue Preference & Company Liquidation 12 Oct 2006 Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Oct 2006	Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for undue preference was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.