Nathan Edmund

Nathan Edmund is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and corruption, drug trafficking and other serious crimes (confiscation of benefits) act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nathan Edmund has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nathan Edmund has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nathan Edmund has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lions Chambers LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2023) PP v Mohammad Shaffy bin Hassan: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2022)
Tan & Pillai	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2021) Raymond Soh Tian Khoon v Public Prosecutor: Application for Disclosure and Witness Recall in Customs Act Charges(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nathan Edmund's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nathan Edmund's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2023 Sivaprakash Krishnan (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2023	Sivaprakash Krishnan (Defendant): GuiltyThe court found Sivaprakash Krishnan guilty of trafficking diamorphine.
2	PP v Mohammad Shaffy bin Hassan: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 12 May 2022 Mohammad Shaffy bin Hassan (Defendant)Lost	12 May 2022	Mohammad Shaffy bin Hassan (Defendant): Conviction and Death SentenceAccused convicted of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
3	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jun 2021 Mohamed Affandi bin Mohamed Yuz Al-Haj (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2021	Mohamed Affandi bin Mohamed Yuz Al-Haj (Defendant): Sentence of 28 years’ imprisonmentThe defendant was sentenced to 28 years’ imprisonment for conspiracy to traffic diamorphine.
4	Raymond Soh Tian Khoon v Public Prosecutor: Application for Disclosure and Witness Recall in Customs Act Charges 14 Mar 2019 Raymond Soh Tian Khoon (Applicant)Lost	14 Mar 2019	Raymond Soh Tian Khoon (Applicant): Motion Dismissed in PartCriminal motion dismissed regarding the recall of witnesses.