Raymond Soh Tian Khoon v Public Prosecutor: Application for Disclosure and Witness Recall in Customs Act Charges

Raymond Soh Tian Khoon applied to the High Court of Singapore for the disclosure of a 'delivery list' and the recall of witnesses in his trial for charges under the Customs Act related to dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes. The High Court, presided over by Aedit Abdullah J, dismissed the motion regarding the recall of witnesses, leaving the issue of disclosure to be resolved between the parties in the trial court. The court emphasized that determinations in criminal trials should be made in open court.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Criminal motion dismissed regarding the recall of witnesses.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application for disclosure of a delivery list and recall of witnesses in a case involving Customs Act charges for dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyMotion OpposedWon
Christopher Ong of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Grace Goh Chioa Wei of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Raymond Soh Tian KhoonApplicantIndividualMotion Dismissed in PartLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Christopher OngAttorney-General’s Chambers
Grace Goh Chioa WeiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Nathan EdmundTan & Pillai

4. Facts

  1. The applicant faced trial for dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes.
  2. The applicant sought disclosure of a 'delivery list' to prove he was not the purchaser.
  3. The Prosecution argued the 'delivery list' was inadmissible hearsay.
  4. The District Judge declined to compel disclosure or recall witnesses.
  5. The applicant filed a criminal motion in the High Court.
  6. The Prosecution's case was that the applicant coordinated deliveries of duty-unpaid cigarettes.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Soh Tian Khoon Raymond v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Motion No 1 of 2019, [2019] SGHC 76

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Ng Seng Kiong pleaded guilty.
Trial heard.
Trial heard.
Ng left the jurisdiction after serving his sentence.
Trial heard.
Trial heard.
Parties to file closing submissions.
Parties to file reply submissions.
Chambers hearing.
Mr. Nathan wrote to the State Courts.
Chambers hearing.
Criminal motion filed.
Chambers hearing; trial verdict postponed.
Hearing date.
Hearing date.
Judgment date.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Disclosure of Evidence
    • Outcome: The court did not make an order for disclosure, leaving it to the parties to resolve.
    • Category: Procedural
  2. Recall of Witnesses
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the application for the recall of witnesses.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order for disclosure of 'delivery list'
  2. Order for recall of witnesses

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ng Chye Huey v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2007] 2 SLR(R) 106SingaporeCited regarding the High Court's revisionary jurisdiction and when criminal motions should be filed.
Ang Poh Chuan v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[1995] 3 SLR(R) 929SingaporeCited regarding the High Court's revisionary jurisdiction.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Customs Act (Cap 70, 2004 Rev Ed) s 128I(1)(b)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 283Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Delivery list
  • Duty-unpaid cigarettes
  • Recall of witnesses
  • Criminal motion
  • Disclosure
  • Customs Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Criminal Law
  • Singapore
  • Customs Act
  • Disclosure
  • Witnesses
  • Criminal Procedure

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Evidence