Neo Jie Min Jamie

Neo Jie Min Jamie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in vicarious liability and civil practice. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in vicarious liability and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Vicarious liability	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Neo Jie Min Jamie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Neo Jie Min Jamie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Sun Yanyuan v Ng Yit Beng: Sale of Flat Under Court Order(Nov 2022) Hwa Aik Engineering v Munshi Mohammad Faiz: Dual Vicarious Liability & Contribution Claims in Personal Injury(Mar 2021) Munshi Mohammad Faiz v Interpro Construction: Vicarious Liability & Negligence in Construction Accident(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Neo Jie Min Jamie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Neo Jie Min Jamie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sun Yanyuan v Ng Yit Beng: Sale of Flat Under Court Order 13 Nov 2022 Sun Yanyuan (Applicant)Partial	13 Nov 2022	Sun Yanyuan (Applicant): Orders made for respondent to have right of first refusal to purchase applicant's share of the flat, failing which the flat will be sold on the open market.Orders made for respondent to have right of first refusal to purchase applicant's share of the flat, failing which the flat will be sold on the open market. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Hwa Aik Engineering v Munshi Mohammad Faiz: Dual Vicarious Liability & Contribution Claims in Personal Injury 16 Mar 2021 Munshi Mohammad Faiz (Respondent)Neutral	16 Mar 2021	Munshi Mohammad Faiz (Respondent): No Submissions FiledNo submissions were filed by the respondent for this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Munshi Mohammad Faiz v Interpro Construction: Vicarious Liability & Negligence in Construction Accident 02 Feb 2021 Munshi Mohammad Faiz (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	02 Feb 2021	Munshi Mohammad Faiz (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; interlocutory judgment entered against the first and third defendants for 100% of the liability arising from the accident. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.