Hwa Aik Engineering v Munshi Mohammad Faiz: Dual Vicarious Liability & Contribution Claims in Personal Injury

Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd applied for leave to appeal against a decision of the General Division of the High Court regarding a personal injuries claim filed by Munshi Mohammad Faiz against Interpro Construction Pte Ltd, K P Builder Pte Ltd, and Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd. The High Court found Interpro Construction Pte Ltd and Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd 100% liable to the plaintiff. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Division of the High Court.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Appellate Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application for leave to appeal decision on dual vicarious liability and contribution claims in a personal injury case. Leave to appeal was dismissed.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Hwa Aik Engineering Pte LtdApplicantCorporationApplication DismissedLostCephas Yee Xiang, Pang Haoyu Samuel, Ng Zhenrong
Munshi Mohammad FaizRespondentIndividualNo Submissions FiledNeutralHan Hean Juan, Neo Jie Min Jamie, Wong Ying Joleen
Interpro Construction Pte LtdRespondentCorporationNo Submissions FiledNeutralRaymond Wong, Ang Xue Ying Rachel

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudge of the Appellate DivisionYes
Quentin LohJudge of the Appellate DivisionNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Cephas Yee XiangAquinas Law Alliance LLP
Pang Haoyu SamuelAquinas Law Alliance LLP
Ng ZhenrongAquinas Law Alliance LLP
Han Hean JuanHoh Law Corporation
Neo Jie Min JamieHoh Law Corporation
Wong Ying JoleenHoh Law Corporation
Raymond WongRW ong Law Corporation
Ang Xue Ying RachelRW ong Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was injured by an excavator operated by Sujan while working at a construction project.
  2. Interpro Construction Pte Ltd was the sub-contractor and employer of the plaintiff.
  3. Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd supplied the excavator and operator (Sujan) to Interpro Construction Pte Ltd.
  4. The excavator moved and collided into the plaintiff when it was not supposed to be moving.
  5. The District Court initially found only Interpro Construction Pte Ltd and K P Builder Pte Ltd liable.
  6. The Judge of the General Division of the High Court found Interpro Construction Pte Ltd and Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd 100% liable.
  7. Neither D1 nor D3 had brought contribution proceedings against any other co-defendant.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd v Munshi Mohammad Faiz and another, Originating Summons No 5 of 2021, [2021] SGHC(A) 1

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff injured by excavator.
Plaintiff commenced action in the District Court (DC/S 265/2017).
District Court found D1 and D2 liable; D3 not liable.
Judge of the General Division of the High Court found D1 and D3 100% liable; D2 not liable.
D3 filed application for leave to appeal.
Application dismissed.
Grounds of decision delivered.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Dual Vicarious Liability
    • Outcome: Leave to appeal was not granted as the appropriate inquiry has been set out in Ng Huat Seng.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Test for imposing joint and dual vicarious liability
      • Lending of an employee
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] 2 SLR 1074
      • [2006] QB 510
  2. Contribution Between Co-Defendants
    • Outcome: Leave to appeal was not granted as D3 had not argued for contribution from D1 or D2 before the Judge.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Apportionment of liability without formal claim
      • Solicitor's omission to file formal claim
    • Related Cases:
      • [2006] QB 510
      • [2012] SGHC 99
      • [1991] 1 SLR(R) 270

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Compensation
  2. Damages for Personal Injuries

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence
  • Personal Injury Claim

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Construction Litigation

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong and anotherUnknownYes[1997] 2 SLR(R) 862SingaporeCited for the three grounds for granting leave to appeal.
IW v IXUnknownYes[2006] 1 SLR(R) 135SingaporeCited for the three grounds for granting leave to appeal.
Ng Huat Seng and another v Munib Mohammad Madni and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 1074SingaporeCited regarding the test for vicarious liability.
Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd and othersCourt of AppealYes[2006] QB 510United KingdomCited regarding the test for vicarious liability and apportionment of liability between co-defendants.
Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society and othersUnknownYes[2012] 3 WLR 1319United KingdomDiscussed the Viasystems case and the approach to vicarious liability.
Manickam Sankar v Selvaraj Madhavan (trading as MKN Construction & Engineering) and anotherHigh CourtYes[2012] SGHC 99SingaporeCited regarding making an order for contribution between co-defendants.
Ng Kim Cheng v Naigai Nitto Singapore Pte Ltd and anotherHigh CourtYes[1991] 1 SLR(R) 270SingaporeCited regarding making an order for contribution between co-defendants, but found to be of no assistance.
Munshi Mohammad Faiz v Interpro Construction Pte Ltd and others and another appealHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 26SingaporeThe Judge’s decision was reported in this case.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 16 r 8 of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed)Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Vicarious Liability
  • Dual Vicarious Liability
  • Contribution Claim
  • Apportionment of Liability
  • Permanent Employer
  • Temporary Employer
  • Excavator
  • Personal Injury
  • Leave to Appeal

15.2 Keywords

  • vicarious liability
  • contribution
  • personal injury
  • construction
  • appeal
  • negligence

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Tort Law
  • Construction Law
  • Appeals
  • Vicarious Liability

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Appeals
  • Tort Law
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Construction Law