Ng Yi Ming Daniel

Ng Yi Ming Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and civil practice. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 54 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yi Ming Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Yi Ming Daniel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Characterist LLC	9 cases	100% of cases	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services(Feb 2022) Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation(Jan 2022) Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Contract Formation & Illegality(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Yi Ming Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.8 parties avg	4.8	33%
Won	63.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2019	44.3 parties avg	4.3
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Yi Ming Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Won	6(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	214,524.00	214,524.001 cases	1
SGD	105,000.00	52,500.002 cases	2
USD	934,727.30	467,363.652 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services 08 Feb 2022 Phua Swee Khiang (Respondent, Defendant)Won	08 Feb 2022	Phua Swee Khiang (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment in favour of RespondentChoo is to pay costs of $45,000 to Phua inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Jan 2022 Phua Swee Khiang (Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2022	Phua Swee Khiang (Respondent): Successful resistance of applicationThe respondent successfully resisted the applicant's application to transfer the appeal.
3	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Contract Formation & Illegality 28 Jun 2021 Phua Swee Khiang (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Won	28 Jun 2021	Phua Swee Khiang (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for accounting of shares allowed; Mr Choo ordered to pay A$214,524 with interest.
4	Recovery Vehicle 1 v Industries Chimiques: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Forum Conveniens 28 Oct 2020 Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	28 Oct 2020	Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedRV1's appeal in CA 31 was dismissed, and RV1 was ordered to pay ICS costs of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Recovery Vehicle 1 v Industries Chimiques Du Senegal: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Forum Conveniens 15 Dec 2019 Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	15 Dec 2019	Recovery Vehicle 1 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedRV1's appeal in RA 179 is allowed.
6	Ang Bee Yian v Ang Siew Fah: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Trust Dispute over Investments & Property 30 Jul 2019 Ang Bee Yian (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	30 Jul 2019	Ang Bee Yian (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claims AllowedThe court ordered the defendant to pay the sum of US$313,827.30 to the plaintiff, and interest at the usual rate from the date of the writ. The court also declared that the defendant holds the said sum of US$313,827.30 (with interest), and all traceable proceeds or assets thereof, on constructive trust for the plaintiff.
7	Saimee Bin Jumaat v IPP Financial Advisers: Negligence, Misrepresentation, and Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 03 Jul 2019 IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Jul 2019	IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd (Defendant): Vicariously LiableIPP is vicariously liable for Moi and Quek’s tort of negligence and is jointly and severally liable to compensate Saimee the sum of USD$620,900 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies USD amounts).
8	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement 19 Feb 2019 Chua Ngak Hwee (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Feb 2019	Chua Ngak Hwee (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed.
9	Grande Corp v Cubix: Striking Out Defences for Discovery Breach 18 Jan 2018 Grande Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	18 Jan 2018	Grande Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.