Nicklaus Tan

Nicklaus Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of confidence and costs. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Selling	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Multi-Level Marketing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicklaus Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicklaus Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Chua Hock Soon James v Public Prosecutor: Multi-Level Marketing, Pyramid Selling Prohibition Act Interpretation(Sep 2017) AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market(Dec 2016) Telemedia Pacific v Yuanta: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Conversion(Dec 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicklaus Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.5 parties avg	3.5	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicklaus Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,516,080.84	9,258,040.422 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chua Hock Soon James v Public Prosecutor: Multi-Level Marketing, Pyramid Selling Prohibition Act Interpretation 25 Sep 2017 Harriet Education Group Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	25 Sep 2017	Harriet Education Group Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
2	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market 26 Dec 2016 GOH CHENGYU (WU CHENGYU) (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2016	GOH CHENGYU (WU CHENGYU) (Defendant): Counterclaims DismissedDefendant's counterclaims were dismissed, and the Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff $1,888,954.60 plus interest. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	Telemedia Pacific v Yuanta: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Conversion 06 Dec 2016 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant)Lost	06 Dec 2016	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantOrdered to pay damages for unauthorized sales of shares and shortfall of loan funds, plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	ANB v ANC: Breach of Confidence & Surreptitious Data Copying in Divorce Proceedings 20 Aug 2015 AND (Respondent)Lost	20 Aug 2015	AND (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and the interlocutory injunction was granted.
5	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Trading & Conclusive Evidence Clauses 28 Jul 2014 Goh Chengyu (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2014	Goh Chengyu (Defendant): Unconditional leave to defend grantedThe Defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend Suit 88 of 2014 in a trial.