Ong Cheong Wei

Ong Cheong Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	15 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	10 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Theft	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ong Cheong Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ong Cheong Wei has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ong Cheong Wei & Co	10 cases	67% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Phua Han Chuan Jeffery: Drug Trafficking - Presumption of Knowledge(Sep 2011) Tan Chin Hock v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Dismissed in Drug Trafficking Case(Dec 2010) PP v Sng Chun Heng: Drug Trafficking - Abetment & Delivery of Diamorphine(Oct 2010)
Belinda Ang Tang & Partners	1 cases	7% of cases	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	7% of cases	Kum Mun Hou v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine(May 2001)
Ong Cheong Wei Law Chambers	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Samruamchit Wipha: Drug Importation under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2015)
Rayney Wong & Eric Ng	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tay Chin Wah: Arms Offences Act - Discharging Revolver and Intention to Cause Injury(Feb 2000)
Ong Cheong Wei & Company	1 cases	7% of cases	PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong Cheong Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 3 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	142.6 parties avg	2.6	93%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2002	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong Cheong Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(93%)	93%
Unknown	1(7%)	7%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (25.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of abetment by instigation of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
2	Public Prosecutor v Samruamchit Wipha: Drug Importation under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Sep 2015 Samruamchit Wipha (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2015	Samruamchit Wipha (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe defendant was found guilty of importing a Class A controlled drug.
3	Public Prosecutor v Phua Han Chuan Jeffery: Drug Trafficking - Presumption of Knowledge 20 Sep 2011 Phua Han Chuan Jeffery (Defendant)Lost	20 Sep 2011	Phua Han Chuan Jeffery (Defendant): Accused found guilty as chargedThe accused was convicted and sentenced to death.
4	Tan Chin Hock v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Dismissed in Drug Trafficking Case 15 Dec 2010 Tan Chin Hock (Appellant)Lost	15 Dec 2010	Tan Chin Hock (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
5	PP v Sng Chun Heng: Drug Trafficking - Abetment & Delivery of Diamorphine 25 Oct 2010 Chan Heng Kong (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	25 Oct 2010	Chan Heng Kong (Defendant, Appellant): ConvictedConvicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
6	Public Prosecutor v Tan Chin Hock: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Aug 2009 Tan Chin Hock (Defendant)Lost	24 Aug 2009	Tan Chin Hock (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted and sentenced to death.
7	Public Prosecutor v Amir bin Jubir: Trafficking of Diamorphine 28 May 2008 Amir bin Jubir (Defendant)Lost	28 May 2008	Amir bin Jubir (Defendant): ConvictedAmir bin Jubir was convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine.
8	Azman bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention 13 Oct 2002 Azman bin Ismail (Appellant)Lost	13 Oct 2002	Azman bin Ismail (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAzman bin Ismail's appeal against his conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.
9	PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium 11 Aug 2002 Ruzaini bin Ajis (Defendant)Lost	11 Aug 2002	Ruzaini bin Ajis (Defendant): GuiltyRuzaini bin Ajis was found guilty of drug trafficking.
10	Public Prosecutor v Chong Siew Chin: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court 12 Dec 2001 Chong Siew Chin (Respondent, Appellant)	12 Dec 2001	Chong Siew Chin (Respondent, Appellant): -
11	Public Prosecutor v Chong Siew Chin: Maid Abuse, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, and Sentencing Appeal 12 Dec 2001 Chong Siew Chin (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	12 Dec 2001	Chong Siew Chin (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe respondent's appeal against conviction was dismissed.
12	Kum Mun Hou v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine 08 May 2001 Kum Mun Hou (Appellant)Lost	08 May 2001	Kum Mun Hou (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
13	Tay Chin Wah v Public Prosecutor: Arms Offences Act & Presumption of Intent to Cause Physical Injury 01 May 2001 Tay Chin Wah (Appellant)Lost	01 May 2001	Tay Chin Wah (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
14	Public Prosecutor v Jimmy Goh: Trafficking of Heroin and Controlled Drugs 22 Dec 2000 Jimmy Goh Chye Soon (Defendant)Lost	22 Dec 2000	Jimmy Goh Chye Soon (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged and sentenced to death.
15	Public Prosecutor v Tay Chin Wah: Arms Offences Act - Discharging Revolver and Intention to Cause Injury 25 Feb 2000 Tay Chin Wah (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2000	Tay Chin Wah (Defendant): Accused convictedThe accused was convicted and received the mandatory death sentence.