Azman bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention

Azman bin Ismail, Ruzaini bin Ajis, and Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh appealed to the Court of Appeal of Singapore on 14 October 2002, against their conviction for trafficking 112.91 grams of diamorphine. The High Court had imposed the mandatory death sentence. The Court of Appeal dismissed their appeals, finding sufficient evidence to prove their possession of the drugs and their common intention to traffic them. The case involved a criminal charge of drug trafficking.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeals Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Azman bin Ismail, Ruzaini bin Ajis, and Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh were convicted of trafficking diamorphine. The Court of Appeal dismissed their appeals, finding sufficient evidence of possession and common intention.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Jaswant Singh of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Azman bin IsmailAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Ruzaini bin AjisAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Mohamed Isnin bin SalehAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJudge of AppealNo
Tan Lee MengJudgeNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Appellants were convicted of trafficking 112.91 grams of diamorphine.
  2. Drugs were hidden in the false ceiling of an apartment.
  3. Azman was found with keys to the apartment and 30 packets of heroin.
  4. Ruzaini arranged for the rental of the apartment.
  5. Isnin's fingerprints were found on the false ceiling where drugs were hidden.
  6. Isnin admitted to packing drugs in the apartment on previous occasions.
  7. Appellants claimed to be acting on instructions of someone named 'Brother'.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Azman bin Ismail and Others v Public Prosecutor, Cr App 7/2002, Cr App 7/2002

6. Timeline

DateEvent
CNB officers conducted surveillance on an apartment
Azman entered the Cascadale apartment
Azman left the Cascadale apartment
Azman received a bag at Kranji MRT station
Azman was arrested
Ruzaini was arrested
Isnin was arrested
Isnin gave a statement to CNB officers
Isnin gave another statement to CNB officers
Appeals dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Possession of Drugs for Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found sufficient evidence to prove that the appellants were in possession of the drugs for the purpose of trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Common Intention to Traffic Drugs
    • Outcome: The court found sufficient evidence to prove the appellants' common intention to traffic the drugs.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction and sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Lim Ah Poh v Public ProsecutorUnknownYes[1992] 1 SLR 713SingaporeCited regarding appellate court's deference to trial judge's findings of fact.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Common Intention
  • Possession
  • False Ceiling
  • Apartment
  • CNB
  • Cascadale

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Appeal
  • Possession
  • Common Intention

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences