Oommen Mathew

Oommen Mathew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 29 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 41% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Oommen Mathew has demonstrated expertise across 157 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banker’s set-off	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Discharge Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver by election	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forbearance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statement of Affairs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Existence of arbitration agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-enforcement injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Courts and Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitrability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-border disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyright Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of oral agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Choice of Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pathological arbitration clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separation of Powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Challenge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Postal Acceptance Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforceability of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contractual Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Court Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agreements to stifle prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Court Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-arbitral discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Applicable Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules in awarding Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Interference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Consent Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement and Compromise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certificate of registration of charge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Facility Letter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of unless order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bonds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oommen Mathew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Oommen Mathew has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haq and Selvam	8 cases	28% of cases	Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action Discovery(Sep 2009) Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidator Liability for Costs in Insolvent Estate(Jan 2006) Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd v Credit Suisse: Banker's Set-Off and Authority to Draw Down on Credit Facility(Jan 2006)
Omni Law LLC	8 cases	28% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order(Jun 2024) DNG FZE v PayPal Pte Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings for Breach of Unless Order(Mar 2024)
Haq & Selvam	5 cases	17% of cases	Lian Kok Hong v Ow Wah Foong: Limitation Act & Negligence in Issuing Termination Certificate(Jul 2008) Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidators' Liability for Unpaid Costs(Aug 2006) Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off(Aug 2006)
Tan Peng Chin & Partners	4 cases	14% of cases	Krishna's India Pte Ltd v Arulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale(Jun 2001) Krishna's India v Abdulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale(Jun 2001) Kim Eng Securities v Ong Eng Poh: Nominee Accounts & Broker's Liability(Jan 2001)
Instructed	1 cases	3% of cases	Acclaim Insurance Brokers v Navigator Investment Services: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration(Jan 2009)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Poh Kim Video: Copyright Infringement under Copyright Act(Dec 2003)
Tan Peng Chin and Partners	1 cases	3% of cases	Kaki Bukit v Ng Man Heng: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings(Mar 2004)
Tan Peng Chin & Patners	1 cases	3% of cases	Commerzbank v Lim Kee Ban Heng: Summary Judgment Appeal on Debt Restructuring(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Oommen Mathew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 12 (41%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	110.0 parties avg	10.0	3%
Lost	173.4 parties avg	3.4	59%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	3%
Partial	46.4 parties avg	6.4	14%
Won	74.6 parties avg	4.6	24%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	35.8 parties avg	5.8
2005	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	65.5 parties avg	5.5
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2023	46.9 parties avg	6.9
2024	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Oommen Mathew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	17(57%)	57%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(13%)	13%
Won	7(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,628,133.72	2,531,406.6920 cases	20
USD	363,350.46	181,675.232 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2006	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 29 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Aug 2024	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Winson to pay costs to OCBC and SCB fixed at $200,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order 25 Jun 2024 Suji Mannattu Thampi (Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2024	Suji Mannattu Thampi (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to the first defendant, to be fixed by the court if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	DNG FZE v PayPal Pte Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings for Breach of Unless Order 11 Mar 2024 D.N.G FZE (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2024	D.N.G FZE (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Costs of $5,000 in SUM 326 and $20,000 in RA 24 awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading 17 Aug 2023 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Aug 2023	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedWinson Oil Trading Pte Ltd's claim against Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd and Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Ltd was dismissed due to the Fraud Exception being established.
5	Cosmetic Care Asia v Sri Linarti: Striking Out Application for Breach of Settlement Agreement 01 May 2023 Facial Care Services Pte Limited (Plaintiff)Neutral	01 May 2023	Facial Care Services Pte Limited (Plaintiff): Application to strike out claim dismissedDefendants' application to strike out the Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed.
6	Er Kok Yong v Tan Cheng Cheng: Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute over BMW M6 Ownership 09 Mar 2023 Er Kok Yong (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Mar 2023	Er Kok Yong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for sole beneficial ownership of the Vehicle based on common intention constructive trust and resulting trust was dismissed.
7	Er Kok Yong v Tan Cheng Cheng: Beneficial Ownership of Property Dispute 16 Feb 2023 Lim Soon Hwa Lawrence (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Feb 2023	Lim Soon Hwa Lawrence (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for beneficial ownership of the property was dismissed.
8	Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs 02 Jan 2022 Then Feng (Applicant)Dismissed	02 Jan 2022	Then Feng (Applicant): Application DismissedThe bankruptcy application was dismissed due to the Applicant's failure to file a complete and accurate Statement of Affairs.
9	Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action Discovery 28 Sep 2009 Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	28 Sep 2009	Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal against the decision in Summons 5059 lostAppeal against the decision in Summons 5059 lost. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Acclaim Insurance Brokers v Navigator Investment Services: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration 11 Jan 2009 Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Jan 2009	Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): WonAppeal dismissed; costs to follow the event and to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Lian Kok Hong v Ow Wah Foong: Limitation Act & Negligence in Issuing Termination Certificate 09 Jul 2008 Lian Kok Hong (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2008	Lian Kok Hong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidators' Liability for Unpaid Costs 15 Aug 2006 ECRC Land Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Lost	15 Aug 2006	ECRC Land Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs payable to the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	OCBC v Ang Thian Soo: Guarantee, Summary Judgment & Director's Liability 14 Aug 2006 Ang Thian Soo (Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2006	Ang Thian Soo (Defendant): Security to be ProvidedThe defendant was ordered to provide security for $9 million as part of the sum claimed, as well as $500,000 as security for costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off 14 Aug 2006 Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2006	Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading: Contempt of Court & Mareva Injunction 18 Jun 2006 Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	18 Jun 2006	Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for contempt of court dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidator Liability for Costs in Insolvent Estate 25 Jan 2006 ECRC Land Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Partial	25 Jan 2006	ECRC Land Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Application Upheld in PartThe liquidators were ordered to make good the sums previously paid out in breach of the estate costs rule. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd v Credit Suisse: Banker's Set-Off and Authority to Draw Down on Credit Facility 15 Jan 2006 Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jan 2006	Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for the return of US$9 million was dismissed.
18	MCST Nos 1298 & 1304 v Chief Assessor: Property Tax on Common Property in Shopping Centre 28 Nov 2005 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan Nos 1298 and 1304 (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2005	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan Nos 1298 and 1304 (Appellant): Motion DismissedMotion dismissed with costs to be paid to the Chief Assessor and the Comptroller. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	OCBC v Infocommcentre: Overdraft Facility Recall & Misrepresentation in Compromise Agreements 28 Jul 2005 Infocommcentre Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Jul 2005	Infocommcentre Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of $34,668,133.72 with interest thereon as at 12 April 2004. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Standard Chartered Bank v Neocorp: Guarantee, Conclusive Evidence Clause & Contract Interpretation 27 Feb 2005 Neocorp International Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Feb 2005	Neocorp International Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim dismissed; ordered to pay $1.5 million plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Sun Fook Kong v HDB: Novation, Bonds, and Limitation in Construction Contracts 06 Apr 2004 Sun Fook Kong Construction Ltd (formerly known as Sung Foo Kee, Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Apr 2004	Sun Fook Kong Construction Ltd (formerly known as Sung Foo Kee, Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed due to lack of locus standi following a valid novation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Kaki Bukit v Ng Man Heng: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 24 Mar 2004 Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Mar 2004	Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe defendants' appeal for a stay of proceedings was dismissed, with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City: Shareholder Dispute & Settlement Agreement Enforcement 23 Feb 2004 Lim Ah Poh (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Feb 2004	Lim Ah Poh (Plaintiff): Application to amend the Originating Summons was partially allowedPrayer (1) of SIC 5348 of 2003 was dismissed in so far as the amendment referred to the settlement agreement, but the addition of the prayer that the company be wound up was allowed. Both parties then consented to the amendment of the OS to include a prayer in the alternative that the defendants be ordered to purchase the plaintiff’s shares in the first defendant.
24	Public Prosecutor v. Poh Kim Video: Copyright Infringement under Copyright Act 02 Dec 2003 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2003	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence imposed by the magistrate was dismissed.
25	Krishna's India Pte Ltd v Arulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale 28 Jun 2001 Krishna's India Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2001	Krishna's India Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim for damages for loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m succeedsThe plaintiffs succeed in their claim for damages for the loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m. The damages payable to KIP will be assessed by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Krishna's India v Abdulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale 28 Jun 2001 Krishna's India Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2001	Krishna's India Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedThe plaintiffs succeed in their claim for damages for the loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m. The damages payable to KIP will be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Commerzbank v Lim Kee Ban Heng: Summary Judgment Appeal on Debt Restructuring 08 Mar 2001 Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2001	Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for $760,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Kim Eng Securities v Ong Eng Poh: Nominee Accounts & Broker's Liability 30 Jan 2001 Ching Sok Gek (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2001	Ching Sok Gek (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims in the third suit are dismissed with costs.
29	Kea Holdings v Gan Boon Hock: Breach of Director's Duties & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 02 Jul 2000 Gan Boon Hock (Respondent)Partial	02 Jul 2000	Gan Boon Hock (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulAppeal partially successful; Gan is ordered to pay US$77,610.