Oung Hui Wen Karen

Oung Hui Wen Karen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction contracts. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	4 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oung Hui Wen Karen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Oung Hui Wen Karen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Neo LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Facade Solution v Mero Asia Pacific: Setting Aside Adjudication for Fraud under SOPA(Sep 2020) CFA v CFB: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Fraud under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act(May 2020) Far East Square v Yau Lee Construction: SOPA & SIA Contract - Final Certificate Effect(May 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Oung Hui Wen Karen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Oung Hui Wen Karen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,276,284.68	758,761.563 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Facade Solution v Mero Asia Pacific: Setting Aside Adjudication for Fraud under SOPA 06 Sep 2020 Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2020	Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedHigh Court's decision to set aside the adjudication determination was affirmed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
2	CFA v CFB: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Fraud under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 18 May 2020 CFB (Respondent)Won	18 May 2020	CFB (Respondent): Application to set aside the adjudication determination grantedCFB's application to set aside the adjudication determination was granted.
3	Far East Square v Yau Lee Construction: SOPA & SIA Contract - Final Certificate Effect 15 May 2019 Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2019	Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of the appeal and below.
4	Yau Lee Construction v Far East Square: SOPA Dispute over Payment Claim Validity and Adjudicator's Jurisdiction 26 Nov 2018 Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2018	Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe developer's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the sum of $2,276,284.68 was ordered to be paid out to the contractor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.