P Balachandran

P Balachandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and construction law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

P Balachandran has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness of Settlement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Benevolence Principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trustee's right of indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Subrogation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Assignment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Retainer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligent Advice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

P Balachandran has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Robert Wang & Woo LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Specific Performance & Property Sale Dispute(Sep 2011) Shanghai Tunnel v Econ-NCC: Arbitration Appeal on Sub-Contract Delay and Waiver(Aug 2010) Econ Piling v Shanghai Tunnel: Appeal on Substantial Completion, Delay & Arbitration(Aug 2010)
Robert Wang & Woo LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Anwar v Ng Chong & Hue: Breach of Retainer, Negligence & Reasonable Settlement(Sep 2015)
M/S Robert Wang & Woo	1 cases	20% of cases	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Priority of Unsecured Trust Creditors and Trust Beneficiary Claims(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of P Balachandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	24.3 parties avg	4.3	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of P Balachandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Remanded	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Anwar v Ng Chong & Hue: Breach of Retainer, Negligence & Reasonable Settlement 29 Sep 2015 ANDREW FRANCIS ANWAR (Appellant)Won	29 Sep 2015	ANDREW FRANCIS ANWAR (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal found that the settlement entered into between the Appellants and SGBT was reasonable, and that it may be regarded as reflecting the proper measure of loss suffered by the Appellants. The Respondents are to pay US$1m to the Appellants.
2	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Priority of Unsecured Trust Creditors and Trust Beneficiary Claims 18 Jul 2013 Ridout Residence Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	18 Jul 2013	Ridout Residence Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe court determined the rights of the creditors to the funds held by Ridout Residence Pte Ltd.
3	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Specific Performance & Property Sale Dispute 27 Sep 2011 Ridout Residence Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	27 Sep 2011	Ridout Residence Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; specific performance denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Shanghai Tunnel v Econ-NCC: Arbitration Appeal on Sub-Contract Delay and Waiver 25 Aug 2010 Econ-NCC Joint Venture (Respondent)Remanded	25 Aug 2010	Econ-NCC Joint Venture (Respondent): Counterclaim to be reconsideredPartial Award and Correction Award remitted to the Arbitrator for his reconsideration on the issue of Econ-NCC Joint Venture’s counterclaim for damages for loss and damage incurred by reason of Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd’s late completion of the Sub-Contract works.
5	Econ Piling v Shanghai Tunnel: Appeal on Substantial Completion, Delay & Arbitration 25 Aug 2010 NCC International Aktiebolag (Appellant)Partial	25 Aug 2010	NCC International Aktiebolag (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partPartial Award remitted to Arbitrator for reconsideration of substantial completion date and reasons for dismissing contra charges.