P Jeya Putra

P Jeya Putra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and injunctions. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

P Jeya Putra has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Retrocession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charter Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

P Jeya Putra has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
AsiaLegal LLC	9 cases	75% of cases	K.V.C. Rice Intertrade Co. v. Asian Mineral Resources: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(Feb 2017) Donald McArthy Trading v Pankaj: Legality of L/C Facility Agreement under Moneylenders Act(Feb 2007) Pankaj v Donald McArthy: Illegal Moneylending & Letters of Credit Dispute(Jul 2006)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	3 cases	25% of cases	Overseas Union Insurance v Home and Overseas Insurance: Reinsurance, Retrocession, and Commutation Agreement Dispute(May 2002) Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd: Appeal on Costs & Leave to Appeal(Apr 2002) Dauphin Offshore v HRH Sheikh Sultan: Unconscionability & Performance Bonds(Jan 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of P Jeya Putra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.6 parties avg	3.6	33%
Neutral	32.8 parties avg	2.8	25%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	8%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of P Jeya Putra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(33%)	33%
Neutral	3(25%)	25%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	2,500.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	K.V.C. Rice Intertrade Co. v. Asian Mineral Resources: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 22 Feb 2017 Tanasan Rice Co., Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	22 Feb 2017	Tanasan Rice Co., Ltd (Plaintiff): Stay of proceedings granted with conditionsStay of proceedings granted with conditions that Asian Mineral will raise no objections to the SIAC President’s jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator and that if the SIAC President declines to make an appointment, either party may apply to court for further orders or directions.
2	Donald McArthy Trading v Pankaj: Legality of L/C Facility Agreement under Moneylenders Act 13 Feb 2007 Nidhi Vinod Didwania (Appellant)Lost	13 Feb 2007	Nidhi Vinod Didwania (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court found that the agreement was not a moneylending arrangement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Pankaj v Donald McArthy: Illegal Moneylending & Letters of Credit Dispute 25 Jul 2006 Nidhi Vinod Didwania (Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2006	Nidhi Vinod Didwania (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found that the arrangement did not constitute moneylending, and therefore ruled against the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v OAS Asia Star: Voyage Charterparty Dispute over Unfit Cargo Tanks 28 Jun 2006 OAS (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2006	OAS (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Brooks v Millar: Injunction for Share Cancellation & Share Register Rectification 25 Jun 2006 3DM (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2006	3DM (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Resisted prayer for rectification of share registerThe defendant successfully resisted the plaintiff's prayer for rectification of the share register.
6	Yap Jeffery v Ho Mun-Tuke: Removal of Liquidator in Company Winding Up 14 Jun 2006 Ho Mun-Tuke Don (Defendant, Liquidator)Neutral	14 Jun 2006	Ho Mun-Tuke Don (Defendant, Liquidator): Resignation PermittedLiquidator permitted to resign from the office of liquidator of the company.
7	Dalian Hualiang v Louis Dreyfus: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act Interpretation 06 Sep 2005 Louis Dreyfus Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2005	Louis Dreyfus Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed against Louis Dreyfus Asia Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Yee Hong v Powen: Arbitrator Removal for Improper Conduct in Construction Arbitration 30 Jun 2005 Powen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Jun 2005	Powen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to remove arbitrator dismissed with costs fixed at $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Liquidator of W&P Piling v Chew Yin What: Private Examination under Companies Act 27 May 2004 Liquidator of W&P Piling Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	27 May 2004	Liquidator of W&P Piling Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partApplication allowed against the first and second respondents.
10	Overseas Union Insurance v Home and Overseas Insurance: Reinsurance, Retrocession, and Commutation Agreement Dispute 19 May 2002 Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd (No 2) (Respondent, Defendant)Won	19 May 2002	Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd (No 2) (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; costs to be paid by the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd: Appeal on Costs & Leave to Appeal 22 Apr 2002 Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Neutral	22 Apr 2002	Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to strike out the appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
12	Dauphin Offshore v HRH Sheikh Sultan: Unconscionability & Performance Bonds 16 Jan 2000 The Private Office of HRH Sheikh Sultan bin Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan (Respondent)Won	16 Jan 2000	The Private Office of HRH Sheikh Sultan bin Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; security for costs shall be paid out to the respondent or its solicitors, to account of its costs.