Pak Waltan

Pak Waltan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in measure of damages and future medical expenses. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pak Waltan has demonstrated expertise across 72 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Future Medical Expenses	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policy Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Safety	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Dependency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor Workshop Instructions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vehicle Insurance Policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pak Waltan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pak Waltan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
United Legal Alliance LLC	7 cases	58% of cases	Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders: Negligence Claim for Motorcycle Accident on Metal Plates(Mar 2016) Law Kin Ying v Lim Hong Hock: Dependency Claim, Personal Injury, PTSD & Depression(Jul 2015) Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Assessment of Damages for Loss of Future Earnings and Medical Expenses in Personal Injury Case(May 2014)
LVM Law Chambers LLC	3 cases	25% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case(Nov 2024) Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases(Aug 2023) Silverlink Resorts v MS First Capital: Scope of Arbitration Agreement & Stay of Proceedings(Nov 2020)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Kazi v Hong: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury(Jun 2009)
B Rao & K S Rajah	1 cases	8% of cases	Yang Xi Na v Lim Chong Hong: Determining Liability in a Collision with a Parked Vehicle(May 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pak Waltan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 4 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.1 parties avg	3.1	58%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pak Waltan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,143,232.42	267,904.058 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case 24 Nov 2024 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2024	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Henderson doctrine was inapplicable, and there was no general abuse of process.
2	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases 14 Aug 2023 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2023	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Silverlink Resorts v MS First Capital: Scope of Arbitration Agreement & Stay of Proceedings 15 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal seeking a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The court ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs of the appeal fixed at $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed by me if not agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
4	Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders: Negligence Claim for Motorcycle Accident on Metal Plates 15 Mar 2016 United Overseas Insurance Ltd (Third Party)Neutral	15 Mar 2016	United Overseas Insurance Ltd (Third Party): NeutralThird Party Proceedings were not pursued. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Kin Ying v Lim Hong Hock: Dependency Claim, Personal Injury, PTSD & Depression 09 Jul 2015 Lim Hong Hock (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2015	Lim Hong Hock (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against Defendant in part for PTSD & Depression, Future medical expenses and Future transport expenses. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Assessment of Damages for Loss of Future Earnings and Medical Expenses in Personal Injury Case 28 May 2014 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Appellant)Lost	28 May 2014	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; no costs ordered against the appellant.
7	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Negligence Claim for Paraplegic Injuries 27 Jun 2013 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2013	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Assistant Registrar's assessment of damages for loss of future earnings and future medical expenses was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kay Lim v Soon Douglas: Implied Terms, Indemnity Clauses & Crane Dismantling Negligence 09 Sep 2012 Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Sep 2012	Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Damages Assessment for Motorcycle Accident Resulting in Paraplegia 28 Jun 2012 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2012	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; special damages of $335,399.49 and general damages of $1,738,032.93 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Ter Yin Wei v Lim Leet Fang: Interpretation of Full and Final Settlement Clause in Discharge Voucher 19 Apr 2012 Ter Yin Wei (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2012	Ter Yin Wei (Appellant, Defendant): Judgment for AppellantAppeal allowed; judgment entered for the Appellant. Costs awarded to the Appellant both in this appeal and in the court below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Kazi v Hong: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 07 Jun 2009 Chong Siak Hong (trading as Hong Hwa Marine Services) (Defendant, Respondent)Won	07 Jun 2009	Chong Siak Hong (trading as Hong Hwa Marine Services) (Defendant, Respondent): WonDefendant prevailed in defending against the majority of the plaintiff's claims. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Yang Xi Na v Lim Chong Hong: Determining Liability in a Collision with a Parked Vehicle 30 May 2006 Ong Ah Seng (Third Party)Lost	30 May 2006	Ong Ah Seng (Third Party): Indemnification OrderThe third party was ordered to indemnify the defendants against 20% of their liability to the plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.