Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders: Negligence Claim for Motorcycle Accident on Metal Plates

In Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard a negligence claim by Tan Bee Hock against F G Builders Pte Ltd, arising from a motorcycle accident on metal plates placed by the Defendant at the entrance of a construction site. Tan Bee Hock alleged that the Defendant's negligence in the placement and maintenance of the metal plates caused his injuries. The court, presided over by Kannan Ramesh JC, dismissed the Plaintiff's claim, finding that the Defendant did not breach its duty of care and that the accident was a result of the Plaintiff's own conduct.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Tan Bee Hock sued F G Builders for negligence after a motorcycle accident on metal plates. The court dismissed the claim, finding no breach of duty.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Tan Bee HockPlaintiffIndividualClaim DismissedLost
F G Builders Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon
United Overseas Insurance LtdThird PartyCorporationNeutralNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kannan RameshJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff, a serviceman, detoured to visit a show unit at Parc Rosewood.
  2. Defendant, F G Builders, was the main contractor for the Parc Rosewood development.
  3. Plaintiff skidded on metal plates placed by the Defendant on Rosewood Drive.
  4. Plaintiff sustained injuries to his left leg and damage to his motorcycle.
  5. The metal plates were placed to facilitate ingress and egress of heavy vehicles.
  6. Plaintiff claimed the plates were warped or unevenly placed.
  7. Defendant argued Plaintiff was negligent and the Code of Practice did not apply.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tan Bee Hock v F G Builders Pte Ltd, Suit No 686 of 2014, [2016] SGHC 37

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff purchased a unit in the Development off the plans.
Plaintiff skidded on metal plates and fell, sustaining injuries.
Defendant applied to the Land Transport Authority for approval to carry out milling and patching work.
Defendant removed the Plates.
Plaintiff emailed the National Environmental Agency to notify them of the accident.
Approval for the said works was granted by the Land Transport Authority.
A police report of the accident was lodged.
Letter of demand from Plaintiff's solicitors to the Defendant.
An injury report was made to the SAF.
SAF report prepared.
Plaintiff underwent surgery at the National University Hospital.
Statement of Claim was filed.
Trial began.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found that the Defendant did not breach its duty of care to the Plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2007] 4 SLR(R) 100
  2. Breach of Statutory Duty
    • Outcome: The court found that the Plaintiff is not entitled to sue for breach of statutory duty in reliance upon the Code.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Nuisance
    • Outcome: The Plaintiff’s cause of action in nuisance fails.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence
  • Breach of Statutory Duty
  • Nuisance

10. Practice Areas

  • Construction Law
  • Personal Injury Law

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology AgencyCourt of AppealYes[2007] 4 SLR(R) 100SingaporeCited for the elements of the tort of negligence.
BNJ (suing by her lawful father and litigation representative, B) v SMRT Trains Ltd and anotherN/AYes[2014] 2 SLR 7SingaporeCited for the analysis of breach of standard of care.
Walker v Northumberland County CouncilN/AYes[1995] ICR 702N/ACited for the standard of care required for the performance of a duty.
Blyth v The Company of Proprietors of the Birmingham WaterworksN/AYes(1856) 11 Exch 781N/ACited for the definition of negligence.
Browne v DunnN/AYes(1893) 6 R 67N/ACited for the rule of fairness.
Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank LtdN/AYes[2007] 1 SLR(R) 292SingaporeCited for the rule of fairness.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Street Works (Works on Public Streets) Regulations 1995 (Cap 320A, Rg 2, 1995 Rev Ed)Singapore
Street Works Act (Cap 320A)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Metal Plates
  • Negligence
  • Duty of Care
  • Breach of Duty
  • Causation
  • Tilt
  • V Placement
  • Code of Practice
  • Rosewood Drive
  • Parc Rosewood

15.2 Keywords

  • Negligence
  • Motorcycle Accident
  • Construction Site
  • Metal Plates
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Tort Law
  • Construction Law
  • Negligence