Palaniappan Sundararaj

Palaniappan Sundararaj is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 28 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and breach of duty of care. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated expertise across 101 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	18 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 18 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pulmonary Fat Embolism	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
IVF Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Birth	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confession and avoidance defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Marine Engineering	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Procedures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Genetic Affinity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assisted Reproduction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Claims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Engineering Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forged Instruments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistaken Payment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Life Insurance Policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Sale Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adoptions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Complex Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palaniappan Sundararaj has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Palaniappan Sundararaj has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	19 cases	68% of cases	Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd: Contempt of Court & Mareva Injunction Breach(Dec 2018) NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation(Sep 2018) NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Economic Loss(Jul 2018)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	7 cases	25% of cases	Pappa v National University Health Services: Negligence & Duty of Care in Hospital Fall(Mar 2023) Thamby Kannu Parvathi v S Geetha: Estate Distribution Dispute over Dunlop Street Property Sale Proceeds(Oct 2022) Grassland Express v Priyatharsini: Striking Out Appeal for Untimely Filing(Jul 2022)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	4% of cases	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Duty to Account and Burden of Proof in Trust Dispute(Nov 2017)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Palaniappan Sundararaj's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 7 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	133.9 parties avg	3.9	46%
Partial	54.2 parties avg	4.2	18%
Won	103.6 parties avg	3.6	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2016	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2018	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	44.4 parties avg	4.4
2022	28.3 parties avg	8.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Palaniappan Sundararaj's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(46%)	46%
Partial	5(18%)	18%
Won	10(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,226,103.18	402,007.9413 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 28 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pappa v National University Health Services: Negligence & Duty of Care in Hospital Fall 28 Mar 2023 Pappa w/o Veeramuthu (Appellant)Won	28 Mar 2023	Pappa w/o Veeramuthu (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The court will hear parties separately on the issue of contributory negligence and costs.
2	Thamby Kannu Parvathi v S Geetha: Estate Distribution Dispute over Dunlop Street Property Sale Proceeds 30 Oct 2022 Thamby Kannu Parvathi (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2022	Thamby Kannu Parvathi (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the Gift Document invalid and ordered the defendants to pay the Plaintiff $1,366,377.62 plus interest from 10 April 2017 at the statutory rate of 5.33% until payment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Grassland Express v Priyatharsini: Striking Out Appeal for Untimely Filing 18 Jul 2022 Grassland Express Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant)Lost	18 Jul 2022	Grassland Express Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant): Appeal struck outThe appeal filed by Grassland Express Pte Ltd was struck out by the court.
4	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan v L Manimuthu: Bankruptcy Appeal on Statutory Demand Compliance 06 Oct 2021 L Mohanasundram (Respondent)Won	06 Oct 2021	L Mohanasundram (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondents costs fixed at $30,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Seto Wei Meng: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 27 Sep 2021 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant)Partial	27 Sep 2021	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal on liability dismissed; appeal on quantum allowed in part.
6	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings & Negligence in Liposuction 04 Jul 2021 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant)Lost	04 Jul 2021	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant): Stay Application dismissedThe Stay Application was dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
7	Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion 27 Jun 2021 Ambihathevi Alagaretnam Mrs Jeevarajah Ambihathevi (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jun 2021	Ambihathevi Alagaretnam Mrs Jeevarajah Ambihathevi (Plaintiff): Interlocutory injunction grantedInterlocutory injunction granted against the defendant, excluding him from the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Lakshmanan Shanmuganathan v L Manimuthu: Bankruptcy Appeal on Statutory Demand 30 Nov 2020 L Mohanasundram (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Nov 2020	L Mohanasundram (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendants successfully defended against the appeal to set aside the statutory demand.
9	Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd: Contempt of Court & Mareva Injunction Breach 16 Dec 2018 Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Dec 2018	Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Fines OrderedThe director and general manager of the defendant were found to be in contempt of court and ordered to pay fines.
10	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation 04 Sep 2018 NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant)Partial	04 Sep 2018	NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements, and 60% of its costs below, assessed on a standard basis, to be taxed on the District Court scale if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Economic Loss 18 Jul 2018 NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant)Partial	18 Jul 2018	NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; judgment for the appellant in the amount of $176,176.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Duty to Account and Burden of Proof in Trust Dispute 15 Nov 2017 Law Chau Loon (Defendant)Lost	15 Nov 2017	Law Chau Loon (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of SGD 3,526,048.71 plus interest. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Rathanamalah v Chia Kok Hoong: Negligence Claim for Nerve Injuries Post Varicose Vein Surgery 03 Jul 2017 Rathanamalah d/o Shunmugam (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jul 2017	Rathanamalah d/o Shunmugam (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for negligence was dismissed.
14	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice 11 May 2017 Hii Chii Kok (Appellant)Lost	11 May 2017	Hii Chii Kok (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in its EntiretyAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Public Prosecutor v. Prem Hirubalan: Appeal Against Sentence for Penal Code and Securities Offences 07 Aug 2016 Prem Hirubalan (Respondent)Lost	07 Aug 2016	Prem Hirubalan (Respondent): Sentences IncreasedThe sentences for Charges 1, 3, and 4 were increased, and the imprisonment terms were ordered to run consecutively.
16	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test 21 Feb 2016 Hii Chii Kok (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Feb 2016	Hii Chii Kok (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims were dismissed in total.
17	Kosui Singapore Pte Ltd v Thangavelu: Appeal on Solicitor-Client Costs and Leave Requirements 21 Jan 2016 Thangavelu (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2016	Thangavelu (Respondent): Application to strike out appeal grantedThe respondent's application to strike out the appeal was granted.
18	Kosui Singapore v Thangavelu: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills under Legal Profession Act 27 Aug 2015 Thangavelu (Respondent)Won	27 Aug 2015	Thangavelu (Respondent): Application DismissedThe applicant's application for an order referring ALC’s bills to taxation was dismissed. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent the costs of and incidental to the application, fixed at $7,500 including disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	ACB v Thomson Medical: Negligence, IVF Error, and Upkeep Claim 14 Jan 2015 ACB (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jan 2015	ACB (Plaintiff): Claim for upkeep deniedThe plaintiff's claim for damages for Baby P's upkeep, in both contract and tort, was denied by the court.
20	ACB v Thomson Medical: Negligence, Breach of Contract & IVF Error 24 Feb 2014 ACB (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Feb 2014	ACB (Plaintiff): Order striking out claim set asideThe order striking out the portion of the claim relating to the upkeep of the child was set aside, and the claim was directed to proceed to trial.
21	Aero-Gate v Engen Marine: Breach of Contract for Diesel Generators 30 Jul 2013 Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2013	Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Menjit Singh v Ong Lay Peng: Whiplash Injury, Damages Assessment, Loss of Earnings 16 Jan 2012 Menjit Singh s/o Hari Singh (Respondent)Lost	16 Jan 2012	Menjit Singh s/o Hari Singh (Respondent): Loss of pre-trial and future earnings award set asideThe court found that Mr. Singh had exaggerated his symptoms and could have continued working as a teacher. Therefore, the award for loss of pre-trial and future earnings was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Surender Singh v Li Man Kay: Medical Negligence in Kidney Donor Death 21 Jul 2009 Minda Kour d/o Hendar Singh (Plaintiff, Administrator)Partial	21 Jul 2009	Minda Kour d/o Hendar Singh (Plaintiff, Administrator): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment with costs awarded on claim against National University Hospital; damages to be assessed at a later date.
24	Raffles Money Change v Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken: Forged Cheques & Bank's Right to Debit Account 16 Feb 2009 Raffles Money Change Pte Ltd (formerly known as Honest Money Changer Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Lost	16 Feb 2009	Raffles Money Change Pte Ltd (formerly known as Honest Money Changer Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
25	Oriental Insurance v Reliance National: Extension of Time for Filing Proof of Debt 20 Apr 2008 The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd (Appellant)Won	20 Apr 2008	The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; Oriental Insurance Co Ltd granted an extension of time until 5.00pm on 22 January 2008 to file its proof of debt.
26	NTUC v Chiang: Interpretation of Disability Benefits in Life Insurance Policy 17 Dec 2007 NTUC Co-operative Insurance Commonwealth Enterprise Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Dec 2007	NTUC Co-operative Insurance Commonwealth Enterprise Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedNTUC Income's appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the District Court was set aside.
27	National Foods Ltd v Pars Ram Brothers: Breach of Contract, Sale of Goods Act & Food Regulations 22 Apr 2007 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2007	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	National Foods Ltd v Pars Ram Brothers: Breach of Contract & Sale of Goods Act for Ginger Export 28 Sep 2006 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2006	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.