Pan Xingzheng Edric

Pan Xingzheng Edric is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and civil practice. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bifurcation of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pan Xingzheng Edric has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pan Xingzheng Edric has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	71% of cases	Group Lease Holdings v JTrust Asia: Issue Estoppel & Damages in Deceit & Conspiracy(Nov 2023) JTrust Asia v Group Lease: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Deceit & Conspiracy Claims(Jun 2023) Dai Yi Ting v Chuang Fu Yuan: Bifurcation Order in Personal Injury Case(Oct 2022)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Lim Jen Lin v Energy Market Company: Claim for Unpaid Remuneration and Bonuses(Oct 2014) Then Kwen Choy Kevin v VibroPower: Commission Dispute Over Diesel Generator Sales(Jun 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pan Xingzheng Edric's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.2 parties avg	6.2	43%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	14%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	27.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pan Xingzheng Edric's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	8,000.001 cases	1
USD	348,949,708.00	116,316,569.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Group Lease Holdings v JTrust Asia: Issue Estoppel & Damages in Deceit & Conspiracy 21 Nov 2023 Mitsuji Konoshita (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	21 Nov 2023	Mitsuji Konoshita (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; liable for damages of US$124,474,854.00 plus interest.
2	JTrust Asia v Group Lease: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Deceit & Conspiracy Claims 15 Jun 2023 Mitsuji Konoshita (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2023	Mitsuji Konoshita (Defendant): Claim AllowedClaim allowed against the defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $124,474,854.00 (USD).
3	Dai Yi Ting v Chuang Fu Yuan: Bifurcation Order in Personal Injury Case 10 Oct 2022 National University of Singapore (Third Party)Neutral	10 Oct 2022	National University of Singapore (Third Party): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome mentioned for the third party in relation to the bifurcation application.
4	Engine Holdings v JTrust Asia: Extended Res Judicata & Abuse of Process 17 Oct 2021 Engine Holdings Asia Pte Ltd (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	17 Oct 2021	Engine Holdings Asia Pte Ltd (Applicant, Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal was dismissed, and Engine Holdings Asia Pte Ltd was ordered to pay JTrust Asia Pte Ltd costs of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	JTrust Asia v Group Lease: Post-Judgment Mareva Injunctions & Undertakings 25 Mar 2021 Mitsuji Konoshita (Respondent)Partial	25 Mar 2021	Mitsuji Konoshita (Respondent): Injunction extended, quantum reducedThe reinstated Mareva injunctions be extended until the respondents satisfy the Judgment Sum and costs. The enjoined quantum of the Mareva injunctions be reduced to US$50 million. R1 and R2 are to file a fresh affidavit within three weeks to disclose assets up to the value of US$100 million, unless the Judgment Sum and costs are paid up by then. Any valuation of assets so disclosed must be properly supported and not based on incomplete, arbitrary or subjective belief. Assumed USD as the judgment refers to USD amounts.
6	Lim Jen Lin v Energy Market Company: Claim for Unpaid Remuneration and Bonuses 14 Oct 2014 Energy Market Company Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2014	Energy Market Company Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant.
7	Then Kwen Choy Kevin v VibroPower: Commission Dispute Over Diesel Generator Sales 23 Jun 2008 VibroPower Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Jun 2008	VibroPower Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant.