Then Kwen Choy Kevin v VibroPower: Commission Dispute Over Diesel Generator Sales
Then Kwen Choy Kevin sued VibroPower Pte Ltd in the High Court of Singapore on 24 June 2008, claiming unpaid commission for diesel electricity generator sales. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding that the sales in question were made by a separate sales team and not directly by the plaintiff, thus he was not entitled to the commission under the employment contract.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Assistant general manager sues VibroPower for unpaid commission on diesel generator sales. The court dismissed the claim, finding the plaintiff not entitled to commission.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Then Kwen Choy Kevin | Plaintiff | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
VibroPower Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment for Defendant | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The plaintiff was employed as assistant general manager of marketing at VibroPower.
- The plaintiff's employment contract included a commission scheme based on sales performance.
- The plaintiff claimed commission for sales made between 2004 and 2006, and a balance from 2003.
- The defendant argued that the plaintiff did not meet the sales target to be entitled to commission.
- The dispute centered on whether sales made in India should be attributed to the plaintiff.
- The court found that the sales in India were made by a separate team, not the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff's assistance to the Indian sales team was deemed minimal and part of his general duties.
5. Formal Citations
- Then Kwen Choy Kevin v VibroPower Pte Ltd, Suit 148/2007, [2008] SGHC 94
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Employment contract signed | |
Employment terminated | |
Suit filed | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found no breach of contract, as the plaintiff did not meet the sales target to be entitled to commission.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Interpretation of commission clause
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
- Interests on the commission
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Manufacturing
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Commission
- Diesel electricity generators
- Nett margin
- Sales target
- Employment contract
15.2 Keywords
- Commission
- Employment
- Contract
- Sales
- Diesel Generators
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Commission | 80 |
Breach of Contract | 75 |
Contract Law | 70 |
Employment Law | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Employment Contract
- Commission Dispute