Pang Haoyu Samuel

Pang Haoyu Samuel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in vicarious liability and civil practice. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and vicarious liability.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Haoyu Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pang Haoyu Samuel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aquinas Law Alliance LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	Hwa Aik Engineering v Munshi Mohammad Faiz: Dual Vicarious Liability & Contribution Claims in Personal Injury(Mar 2021) Munshi Mohammad Faiz v Interpro Construction: Vicarious Liability & Negligence in Construction Accident(Feb 2021) Zheng Hongfan v Singaravelu Murugan: Power of Attorney & Agent's Authority in Loan Agreement(Aug 2019)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Re Picotin Pte Ltd: Moratoria for Related Companies under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pang Haoyu Samuel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pang Haoyu Samuel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	5,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Picotin Pte Ltd: Moratoria for Related Companies under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 17 Jun 2024 The Hogs Bars Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	17 Jun 2024	The Hogs Bars Pte Ltd (Applicant): Moratorium extendedMoratorium extended for three months from today, or other order of court, subject to conditions.
2	Hwa Aik Engineering v Munshi Mohammad Faiz: Dual Vicarious Liability & Contribution Claims in Personal Injury 16 Mar 2021 Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	16 Mar 2021	Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to appeal was dismissed. No order as to costs was made as the respondents did not file submissions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Munshi Mohammad Faiz v Interpro Construction: Vicarious Liability & Negligence in Construction Accident 02 Feb 2021 Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	02 Feb 2021	Hwa Aik Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; interlocutory judgment entered against the first and third defendants for 100% of the liability arising from the accident. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Zheng Hongfan v Singaravelu Murugan: Power of Attorney & Agent's Authority in Loan Agreement 07 Aug 2019 Zheng Hongfan (Plaintiff)Won	07 Aug 2019	Zheng Hongfan (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication for mandatory injunction granted; defendant to pay costs to the plaintiff fixed at $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).