Pavan Kumar Ratty

Pavan Kumar Ratty is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duties of Legal Profession	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Head Injuries	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Supervision of employees and staff	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pavan Kumar Ratty has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pavan Kumar Ratty has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
P K Ratty & Partners	5 cases	100% of cases	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute(Jun 2010) Desin Construction v Cattel Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Payment for Diversion Project(Sep 2009) Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Discovery of Documents in Construction Contract Dispute(Feb 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pavan Kumar Ratty's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pavan Kumar Ratty's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	1,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute 29 Jun 2010 Bing Integrated Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2010	Bing Integrated Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the amount owed to be determined by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Desin Construction v Cattel Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Payment for Diversion Project 10 Sep 2009 Desin Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Sep 2009	Desin Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim dismissed with costsPlaintiff's claim for a further payment of $2,955,912.69, as well as the alternate claims for damages for breach of contract, or payment in quantum meruit, are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Discovery of Documents in Construction Contract Dispute 21 Feb 2008 Bing Integrated Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2008	Bing Integrated Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $1,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Law Society of Singapore v Tan Chwee Wan Allan: Breach of Legal Profession Rules and Supervision of Staff 19 Sep 2007 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	19 Sep 2007	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Law Society's application was granted, and the respondent was ordered to pay $5,000 for costs of the disciplinary proceedings below in addition to the disbursements incurred by the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Chong Hwa Wee v Estate of Loh Hon Fock: Damages for Brain Injury and Loss of Amenities 10 May 2006 Estate of Loh Hon Fock, deceased (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	10 May 2006	Estate of Loh Hon Fock, deceased (Defendant, Respondent): Cross-appeal dismissed in partCross-appeal dismissed except for one item, namely, the claim by the plaintiff’s mother for her loss of earnings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.