Peter Cuthbert Low

Peter Cuthbert Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 28 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated expertise across 94 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	7 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Town Council Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Priority of Creditors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Local Government Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Academic Dishonesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equality of Arms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Canon Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ecclesiastical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Cuthbert Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Cuthbert Low has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Low LLC	9 cases	32% of cases	PP v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, and the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2017) Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking - Joint Possession of Diamorphine(May 2017) Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Statutory Interpretation & Town Council's Access to Documents(Oct 2016)
Peter Low Tang & Belinda Ang	4 cases	14% of cases	Toh Kim Chan v Toh Kim Tian: Accounting of Partnership Assets and Transfer to Company(Mar 2004) Re Seed Nigel John QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Queen's Counsel, Criminal Breach of Trust, Canon Law(Aug 2003) Just Gems Ltd v Ooi: Failed Share Transfer & Recovery of Funds(Jan 2002)
Peter Low Partnership	4 cases	14% of cases	Lee Hsien Loong v Review Publishing: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Libel Suits(Oct 2007) Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction(Sep 2007) Lee Hsien Loong & Lee Kuan Yew v Review Publishing: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Libel Suits(May 2007)
Peter Low & Choo LLC	3 cases	11% of cases	Law Society v Chia Chwee Imm Helen: Disciplinary Procedures for Non-Practicing Solicitors(Jun 2021) Singapore Air Charter v Peter Low & Choo LLC: Priority of Judgment Creditors in Property Sale(Oct 2020) Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation(Sep 2018)
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	3 cases	11% of cases	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Title & Final Payment(Jul 2011) Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand(Aug 2010) Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release(Feb 2010)
Peter Low Tang and Belinda Ang	3 cases	11% of cases	Chan Emily v Kang Hock Chai Joachim: Breach of Trust Claim over Shares and Funds(Feb 2005) CX v CY: Child Custody, Care & Control, and Access Dispute(Jan 2005) MCST Plan No 2285 v Sum Lye Heng: Abuse of Process & Stay of Proceedings(Mar 2004)
Colin Ng & Partners	1 cases	4% of cases	Lee Tung Co: Winding Up Application by Non-Minority Shareholder on Just and Equitable Grounds(Nov 2007)
M/s Peter Low LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Town Council's Financial Obligations and Remedies(Nov 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Cuthbert Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 12 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Lost	175.2 parties avg	5.2	61%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Stayed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Won	73.1 parties avg	3.1	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	28.4 parties avg	8.4
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	54.9 parties avg	4.9
2010	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2011	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2013	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	34.2 parties avg	4.2
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Cuthbert Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	17(61%)	61%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Partial	1(4%)	4%
Stayed	1(4%)	4%
Won	7(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	312,587.26	31,258.7310 cases	10
USD	550,000.00	550,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	5 14	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 4 cases (80.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 28 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Chia Chwee Imm Helen: Disciplinary Procedures for Non-Practicing Solicitors 13 Jun 2021 Chia Chwee Imm Helen Mrs Helen Thomas (Respondent)Lost	13 Jun 2021	Chia Chwee Imm Helen Mrs Helen Thomas (Respondent): Application AllowedThe application for leave to investigate a complaint of misconduct against the Respondent was allowed.
2	Singapore Air Charter v Peter Low & Choo LLC: Priority of Judgment Creditors in Property Sale 13 Oct 2020 Peter Low & Choo LLC (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2020	Peter Low & Choo LLC (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Peter Low & Choo LLC to receive $50,000 inclusive of disbursements from Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation 02 Sep 2018 Neo Ah Luan (Appellant)Partial	02 Sep 2018	Neo Ah Luan (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to six weeks' imprisonment per charge, to run concurrently (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	PP v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, and the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Jul 2017 Cheng Pueh Kuang (Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2017	Cheng Pueh Kuang (Defendant): Imprisonment for 27 yearsSentenced to 20 years for the First charge and 7 years for the Sixth charge, to run consecutively.
5	Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking - Joint Possession of Diamorphine 02 May 2017 Cheng Pueh Kuang (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2017	Cheng Pueh Kuang (Defendant): Conviction on amended chargeConvicted on the amended charge of joint possession of 10.17g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
6	Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Statutory Interpretation & Town Council's Access to Documents 27 Oct 2016 ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Respondent)Neutral	27 Oct 2016	ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Respondent): Orders MadeOrders made for document access to Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council.
7	Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council: Town Council's Financial Obligations and Remedies 26 Nov 2015 ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Respondent)Lost	26 Nov 2015	ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with orders made against the respondent regarding sinking fund transfers and the appointment of accountants.
8	Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Upholding Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes 19 Aug 2015 TAY KENG HONG (Appellant)Lost	19 Aug 2015	TAY KENG HONG (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Stay of Action for Arbitration under Arbitration Act 09 Feb 2015 SIM CHAY KOON (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	09 Feb 2015	SIM CHAY KOON (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to stay the action in favour of arbitration was dismissed.
10	Tey Tsun Hang v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Gifts, and Academic Favoritism at National University of Singapore 27 Feb 2014 Tey Tsun Hang (Appellant)Won	27 Feb 2014	Tey Tsun Hang (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction allowed; convictions set aside. Order of forfeiture of items set aside, and penalties to be refunded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	BMP v BMQ: Contempt of Court for Breach of Mareva Injunction 04 Dec 2013 BMP (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	04 Dec 2013	BMP (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.
12	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights 08 Apr 2013 Kenneth Chee Mun-Leon (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Apr 2013	Kenneth Chee Mun-Leon (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that s 377A is unconstitutional and infringes their rights under Art 12 was dismissed.
13	Law Society v. Nair: Striking Off for Misconduct Unbefitting an Advocate and Solicitor 21 Aug 2011 Law Society of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	21 Aug 2011	Law Society of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court ordered that the defendant be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and awarded costs to the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Title & Final Payment 14 Jul 2011 Maria Ng (Appellant, Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2011	Maria Ng (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Ngs' appeal was allowed, and they were awarded costs of the appeals and of the trial below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand 02 Aug 2010 Maria Ng (Plaintiff)Stayed	02 Aug 2010	Maria Ng (Plaintiff): Action stayedAction stayed for parties to resolve title issues in Thai courts; contractual issues reserved.
16	Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release 08 Feb 2010 Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Feb 2010	Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to both plaintiffs in the total amount of $70,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Lee Tung Co: Winding Up Application by Non-Minority Shareholder on Just and Equitable Grounds 21 Nov 2007 Chow Kwok Ching (Respondent)Lost	21 Nov 2007	Chow Kwok Ching (Respondent): Opposition unsuccessfulChow Kwok Ching opposed the winding up application, but the court granted the order.
18	Lee Hsien Loong v Review Publishing: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Libel Suits 16 Oct 2007 Hugo Restall (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2007	Hugo Restall (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for admission of QC was dismissed.
19	Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction 06 Sep 2007 Narindar Singh Kang (Applicant)Dismissed	06 Sep 2007	Narindar Singh Kang (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for reinstatement to the roll of advocates and solicitors was dismissed as premature.
20	Lee Hsien Loong & Lee Kuan Yew v Review Publishing: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Libel Suits 31 May 2007 Gavin James Millar (Applicant)Lost	31 May 2007	Gavin James Millar (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission to represent the defendants in the libel suits and jurisdiction appeals was dismissed.
21	Lee Hsien Loong v Review Publishing: Defamation, Service Out of Jurisdiction & Rules of Court 20 Feb 2007 Hugo Restall (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Feb 2007	Hugo Restall (Defendant, Appellant): Appeals dismissedAppeals dismissed.
22	Chan Emily v Kang Hock Chai Joachim: Breach of Trust Claim over Shares and Funds 17 Feb 2005 Kang Hock Chai Joachim (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2005	Kang Hock Chai Joachim (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant lost the case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	CX v CY: Child Custody, Care & Control, and Access Dispute 27 Jan 2005 CY (Defendant, Respondent)Won	27 Jan 2005	CY (Defendant, Respondent): Care and control grantedCare and control of the child granted to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Toh Kim Chan v Toh Kim Tian: Accounting of Partnership Assets and Transfer to Company 30 Mar 2004 Toh Kim Chan (Plaintiff)Won	30 Mar 2004	Toh Kim Chan (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDefendant ordered to pay Plaintiff $72,587.26, representing 20% of unaccounted assets, plus interest at 6% p.a. from the date of service of the writ of summons to the date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	MCST Plan No 2285 v Sum Lye Heng: Abuse of Process & Stay of Proceedings 29 Mar 2004 Chua Boon Chye (Appellant)Lost	29 Mar 2004	Chua Boon Chye (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Re Seed Nigel John QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Queen's Counsel, Criminal Breach of Trust, Canon Law 20 Aug 2003 Nigel John Seed QC (Applicant)Lost	20 Aug 2003	Nigel John Seed QC (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to admit Nigel John Seed QC as an advocate and solicitor was dismissed.
27	Just Gems Ltd v Ooi: Failed Share Transfer & Recovery of Funds 30 Jan 2002 Just Gems Limited (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2002	Just Gems Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of US$550,000. The first defendant shall pay interest on the total sum of US$550,000 at 6% p.a. from the date of the writ.
28	Law Society of Singapore v Disciplinary Committee: Kwa Kim Li & Quahe Mei Lin - Professional Conduct & Touting 13 Aug 2000 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Lost	13 Aug 2000	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application dismissedThe Law Society's application for an order directing Vivien Quahe Mei Lin and Kwa Kim Li to show cause for disciplinary action was dismissed.