Peter Madhavan

Peter Madhavan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Madhavan has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defective equipment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scope of Liability in Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cervical Whiplash	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Madhavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Madhavan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Madhavan Partnership	5 cases	71% of cases	Collars v. Collars: Dispute Over Lombard Account Funds and Estate Distribution(Jul 2008) Re Will and Codicil of Tan Tye: Interpretation of 'Male Issue' in Will(May 2004) Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage(Nov 2003)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute(Dec 2018) Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Striking Out of Statement of Claim for Breach of Unless Orders(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Madhavan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	43%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	43.2 parties avg	3.2	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Madhavan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Withdrawn	1(13%)	13%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	17,000.00	4,250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute 30 Dec 2018 Moh Tai Tong (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2018	Moh Tai Tong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the first defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Striking Out of Statement of Claim for Breach of Unless Orders 02 Jul 2013 Mitora Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	02 Jul 2013	Mitora Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with no order of costs. Cost orders below were not disturbed.
3	Collars v. Collars: Dispute Over Lombard Account Funds and Estate Distribution 10 Jul 2008 Collars Marina Bernardette Das Dores Alias Marina Bernardette Das Dores Collars (Plaintiff)Won	10 Jul 2008	Collars Marina Bernardette Das Dores Alias Marina Bernardette Das Dores Collars (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs of the application fixed at $8,500 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Re Will and Codicil of Tan Tye: Interpretation of 'Male Issue' in Will 20 May 2004 Male persons in the exclusively male line (Claimant)Won	20 May 2004	Male persons in the exclusively male line (Claimant): Claim AllowedClaim to share in the corpus of Tan Tye’s estate allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage 20 Nov 2003 Falcon Piling Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Nov 2003	Falcon Piling Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against the defendant for general damages to be assessed, loss of rental, special damages, and costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lim Yee Ming v Ubin Lagoon Resort: Negligence, Defective Equipment & Personal Injury 22 Jun 2003 Ubin Lagoon Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Jun 2003	Ubin Lagoon Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim against DefendantThe court found the Suppliers liable for negligence and breach of implied contractual terms, leading to judgment in favor of Lim, with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
7	Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury on Circular Road 18 Nov 2002 Poh Choon Ann (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Withdrawn	18 Nov 2002	Poh Choon Ann (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Action WithdrawnAction against the second defendant was withdrawn (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).