Por Hock Sing Michael

Por Hock Sing Michael is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in force majeure and arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consumer Protection	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Por Hock Sing Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Por Hock Sing Michael has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Lee & Partners	3 cases	50% of cases	Compact Metal Industries v Enersave Power Builders: Wrongful Termination of Sub-Contract & Payment Dispute(Nov 2008) RDC Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Termination of Contract for Failure to Supply Concrete Meeting LTA Requirements(Aug 2007) Sato Kogyo v RDC Concrete: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure in Concrete Supply(Nov 2006)
Michael Por Law Corporation	3 cases	50% of cases	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2019) Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Appeal Out of Time & Extension of Time for Arbitration Award(Nov 2019) Chan Chee Kien v Performance Motors Ltd: Misrepresentation & Sale of Goods Act Dispute(Feb 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Por Hock Sing Michael's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Por Hock Sing Michael's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	401,802.64	100,450.664 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Appeal Out of Time & Extension of Time for Arbitration Award 04 Nov 2019 Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Nov 2019	Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to appeal was dismissed, upholding the original arbitral award in favor of Aikco Construction Pte Ltd.
2	Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 04 Nov 2019 Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	04 Nov 2019	Aikco Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications to set aside the arbitral award and to set aside the order of court granting the respondent leave to enforce the award were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chan Chee Kien v Performance Motors Ltd: Misrepresentation & Sale of Goods Act Dispute 25 Feb 2015 Chan Chee Kien (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Feb 2015	Chan Chee Kien (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for misrepresentation and breach of contract was dismissed.
4	Compact Metal Industries v Enersave Power Builders: Wrongful Termination of Sub-Contract & Payment Dispute 09 Nov 2008 Compact Metal Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Nov 2008	Compact Metal Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Enersave shall also refund Compact the sum of S$165,000 (being the total sum paid to Enersave vis-à-vis its purported calls on the Performance Bond and Guarantee) and all retention moneys. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	RDC Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Termination of Contract for Failure to Supply Concrete Meeting LTA Requirements 28 Aug 2007 RDC Concrete Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	28 Aug 2007	RDC Concrete Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The exact quantum of damages to be awarded to the Plaintiff is to be assessed by the Registrar if the parties are unable to agree thereon. The Plaintiff is also entitled to interest on this sum at 3% per annum with effect from 22 July 2005, which is the date the writ was filed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Sato Kogyo v RDC Concrete: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure in Concrete Supply 23 Nov 2006 RDC Concrete Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Nov 2006	RDC Concrete Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for the defendant on its counterclaimJudgment for the defendant on its counterclaim of $236,802.64 with costs. The plaintiff is entitled to set off item 3 in [111] when assessed and deduct from the counterclaim other damages when quantified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.