Quah Chun En Joel

Quah Chun En Joel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and resulting trusts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pre-incorporation acts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Quah Chun En Joel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quah Chun En Joel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Margin Trading, Broker-Dealer Agreements & Investor Claims(Sep 2024) Asia Petworld v Sivabalan: Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy in Pet Supply Industry(May 2022) Ong Chai Soon v Ong Chai Koon: Constructive Trusts & Housing Development Act Interpretation(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quah Chun En Joel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quah Chun En Joel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	250,000.00	125,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Margin Trading, Broker-Dealer Agreements & Investor Claims 23 Sep 2024 Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	23 Sep 2024	Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety. Costs awarded in favour of the Respondents on the indemnity basis in the sum of $85,000 all-in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Asia Petworld v Sivabalan: Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy in Pet Supply Industry 25 May 2022 Asia Petworld Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2022	Asia Petworld Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of confidence and conspiracy was dismissed.
3	Ong Chai Soon v Ong Chai Koon: Constructive Trusts & Housing Development Act Interpretation 21 Apr 2022 Ong Soh Ai (Respondent)Won	21 Apr 2022	Ong Soh Ai (Respondent): WonAppeal dismissed; awarded $50,000 in costs from the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ong Chai Koon v Ong Chai Soon: Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust & Proprietary Estoppel in Family Property Dispute 05 Apr 2021 Ong Soh Ai (Plaintiff)Won	05 Apr 2021	Ong Soh Ai (Plaintiff): Order for sale of shophouse and equal division of proceedsPlaintiffs granted an order that the defendant, within 12 months, sell the Hougang shophouse in the open market. The net proceeds from the sale of the Hougang shophouse shall be distributed amongst the Ong siblings equally.