Raj Singam

Raj Singam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical malpractice and forum non conveniens. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raj Singam has demonstrated expertise across 60 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Urology	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offers to Settle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-operative care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fertility treatment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceuticals Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Products Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oil and Gas Concession Project	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cost Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Infertility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raj Singam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raj Singam has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier	6 cases	60% of cases	Praptono v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Oral Contract Dispute(Dec 2001) Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew: Negligence, Damages, and Costs in Post-Operative Care(Oct 2001) Andre Ravindran v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Enforceability of Legal Fees in Cross-Border Engagements(Jul 2001)
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	30% of cases	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence(Oct 2003) Koh Ewe Chee v Koh Hua Leong: Partnership Dispute & Property Ownership(Feb 2003) Praptono v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Oral Agreements in Petroleum Project Dispute(Dec 2001)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	Chow Hoo Siong v Lee Dawn Audrey: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raj Singam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Partial	52.6 parties avg	2.6	50%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	53.4 parties avg	3.4
2003	33.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raj Singam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Partial	5(50%)	50%
Won	3(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,124,936.65	187,489.446 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2003	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chow Hoo Siong v Lee Dawn Audrey: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance 09 Oct 2003 Chow Hoo Siong (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	09 Oct 2003	Chow Hoo Siong (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partHusband is to pay the Wife a sum of $638,901.75 as her share of the matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence 02 Oct 2003 De Cruz Andrea Heidi (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2003	De Cruz Andrea Heidi (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the second, third, and fourth defendants for the amounts computed above together with costs to be taxed or agreed. There is to be only one set of costs in respect of the second and third defendants. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	Koh Ewe Chee v Koh Hua Leong: Partnership Dispute & Property Ownership 10 Feb 2003 Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Feb 2003	Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claim that Sin Wah Seng was a sole proprietorship was dismissed. The court determined that Sin Wah Seng was a partnership with three equal partners and the properties in dispute were partnership assets to be shared equally, with a credit to the Plaintiff for lottery winnings used for renovations on one property. Costs awarded to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Praptono v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Oral Agreements in Petroleum Project Dispute 27 Dec 2001 His Royal Highness Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Dec 2001	His Royal Highness Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; stay of proceedings granted.
5	Praptono v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Oral Contract Dispute 27 Dec 2001 His Royal Highness Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Dec 2001	His Royal Highness Tunku Ibrahim Ismail Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal for a stay of proceedings was allowed.
6	Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew: Negligence, Damages, and Costs in Post-Operative Care 12 Oct 2001 Harte Denis Mathew (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Oct 2001	Harte Denis Mathew (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartMr. Harte's appeal was allowed in part, with increased damages awarded. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
7	Andre Ravindran v Tunku Ibrahim: Forum Non Conveniens & Enforceability of Legal Fees in Cross-Border Engagements 31 Jul 2001 Tunku Ibrahim Ismail bin Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	31 Jul 2001	Tunku Ibrahim Ismail bin Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal against the refusal to stay proceedings was dismissed.
8	Harte v Tan: Negligence, Medical Malpractice & Costs in Fertility Treatment 30 Jan 2001 Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Jan 2001	Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in part; damages awarded in the amount of S$96,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gift of Shares & Maintenance 04 Dec 2000 Tan Soan Lian (Respondent)Partial	04 Dec 2000	Tan Soan Lian (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part regarding the division of the matrimonial home and the quantum of lump sum maintenance.
10	Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy 23 Nov 2000 Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Nov 2000	Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partPartial judgment in favor of the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $32,995.62 (SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).