Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gift of Shares & Maintenance
In Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal concerning the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance following a divorce. The appellant, Lee Yong Chuan Edwin, challenged the High Court's decision regarding the valuation of the matrimonial home, the quantum of lump sum maintenance payable to the respondent, Tan Soan Lian, and the inclusion of shares in Lee Kim Tah Holdings Limited and Lee Kim Tah Investments Pte Ltd as part of the matrimonial assets. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal regarding the matrimonial home and maintenance but allowed the appeal regarding the shares, ruling that they should be excluded from the pool of matrimonial assets.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Court of Appeal1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal concerning the division of matrimonial assets, including gifted shares and the matrimonial home, and the quantum of lump sum maintenance.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lee Yong Chuan Edwin | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | Harry Elias, Yeo Yen Ping |
Tan Soan Lian | Respondent | Individual | Appeal dismissed in part | Partial | Raj Singam, Edmund Kronenburg |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chao Hick Tin | Justice of Appeal | Yes |
L P Thean | Justice of Appeal | No |
Yong Pung How | Chief Justice | No |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Harry Elias | Harry Elias Partnership |
Yeo Yen Ping | Harry Elias Partnership |
Raj Singam | Drew & Napier |
Edmund Kronenburg | Drew & Napier |
4. Facts
- The appellant and respondent married on 4 July 1980 and have two children.
- The respondent was a full-time housewife.
- The parties separated on 1 July 1992.
- The respondent filed for divorce on 14 March 1997.
- The appellant received shares in family companies as gifts before and during the marriage.
- The matrimonial home was valued at $4.38m but sold for $3.5m.
- The district judge awarded the respondent a lump sum maintenance of $960,000.
5. Formal Citations
- Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian, CA 39/2000, [2000] SGCA 68
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Appellant married the respondent | |
First child born | |
Lee Kim Tah group of companies underwent an amalgamation exercise | |
Second child born | |
Shareholders of LKTH transferred a portion of their shares in exchange for shares of equivalent value in LKTI | |
Parties entered into a deed of separation | |
Respondent filed a petition for divorce against the appellant | |
Decree nisi was granted | |
Valuation report by M/s Edmund Tie & Company | |
District Judge Khoo Oon Soo gave his decision | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court ruled that the appellant's shares in LKTH and LKTI, received in exchange for gifted shares, should be excluded from the pool of matrimonial assets.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Inclusion of gifted shares
- Valuation of matrimonial home
- Maintenance
- Outcome: The court upheld the High Court's decision on the lump sum maintenance amount.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Quantum of lump sum maintenance
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of matrimonial assets
- Lump sum maintenance
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Law
- Matrimonial Assets Division
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hoong Khai Soon v Cheng Kwee Eng | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1993] 3 SLR 34 | Singapore | Cited to discuss whether an asset acquired during marriage in exchange for a gift should be considered a matrimonial asset. |
Koh Kim Lan Angela v Choong Kian Haw | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1994] 1 SLR 22 | Singapore | Cited to discuss whether shares acquired in exchange for other shares during the marriage should be considered matrimonial assets. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
s 112(10) of the Women`s Charter | Singapore |
s 114(2) of the Women`s Charter | Singapore |
s 114(1) of the Women`s Charter | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial assets
- Lump sum maintenance
- Gifted shares
- Amalgamation
- Matrimonial home
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Matrimonial assets
- Maintenance
- Gifted shares
- Singapore
- Family Law
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Maintenance
17. Areas of Law
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Division of Matrimonial Assets