Rajan Sanjiv Kumar

Rajan Sanjiv Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajan Sanjiv Kumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute(Mar 2024) JSD Corp v Tri-Line Express: Damages for Vehicle Damage & Cost of Cure(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajan Sanjiv Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	22%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajan Sanjiv Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	3(33%)	33%
Won	3(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act 19 Aug 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	19 Aug 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore took the view that a minimum reinstatement interval of between two and three years would be sufficient in the circumstances (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute 26 Mar 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialThe court upheld the examination order but set aside the order granting leave to serve Ms. Fan out of jurisdiction, and consequently, the substituted service order. The court also set aside the order granting leave to serve Mr. Ruan out of jurisdiction, subject to any application made within 10 days by the parties or either of them to vary or discharge the order.
3	JSD Corp v Tri-Line Express: Damages for Vehicle Damage & Cost of Cure 18 Sep 2022 JSD Corporation Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	18 Sep 2022	JSD Corporation Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, succeeding in claiming the outstanding repair costs in relation to the 1976 BMW, 1977 BMW and the spare parts. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chandroo Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Nov 2021 Kamalnathan a/l Muniandy (Appellant)Lost	25 Nov 2021	Kamalnathan a/l Muniandy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
5	Chiong Chin May Selena v Attorney-General: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 29 Jun 2021 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2021	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for reinstatement to the roll of advocates and solicitors was dismissed. No order as to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	PP v Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway: Trafficking, Possession of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Oct 2020 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Defendant)Lost	29 Oct 2020	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Defendant): GuiltyRoshdi was found guilty of possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
7	PP v Andi Ashwar & Ors: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Feb 2019 Mohammed Rusli Bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Partial	26 Feb 2019	Mohammed Rusli Bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant): PartialConvicted on amended charge.
8	Sumoi Paramesvaeri v Fleury Jeffrey Gerard: Property Rights & Trusts Dispute 01 Sep 2016 Sumoi Paramesvaeri (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	01 Sep 2016	Sumoi Paramesvaeri (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claim AllowedPlaintiff holds a beneficial interest in the same proportion as her legally registered interest of 10%, and an order for sale in lieu of partition of that 10% interest, with the right of first refusal given to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Nathan Edmund v Law Society: Application for Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 20 Nov 2012 Nathan Edmund (Applicant)Won	20 Nov 2012	Nathan Edmund (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for reinstatement to the roll of advocates and solicitors was allowed, subject to conditions proposed by the Law Society.