Rajan Supramaniam

Rajan Supramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and penal code.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	14 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	12 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
House-trespass	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences against public servants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences against Minors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Taking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Penetration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal force and assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Penetration of Minor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug-related Sexual Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Paid Sex with a Minor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pedophilia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Familial Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Supervision of employees and staff	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outraging Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajan Supramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajan Supramaniam has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hilborne & Co	8 cases	53% of cases	PP v Iskandar bin Rahmat: Murder Conviction for Double Homicide at Hillside Drive(Dec 2015) Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai: Rape, Attempted Murder, House-Trespass(Apr 2013) Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material(Aug 2011)
Hilborne Law LLC	3 cases	20% of cases	Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking(Jan 2017) Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2015) Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under MDA(Sep 2014)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation(Jun 2009)
Regent Law LLC	1 cases	7% of cases	PP v Ahiruddin: Mask Refusal & Attack on Safe Distancing Officer - Public Servant Protection(Mar 2022)
Aziz Tayabali and Associates	1 cases	7% of cases	Chiam Toon Hong v Ong Soo Yong: Dispute over Rescission of Land Sale Contract(Jun 2004)
Tan See Swan and Co	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader: Rape under Penal Code s 376(1)(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajan Supramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	132.1 parties avg	2.1	87%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajan Supramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(87%)	87%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Ahiruddin: Mask Refusal & Attack on Safe Distancing Officer - Public Servant Protection 17 Mar 2022 Ahiruddin Al-Had bin Haji Arrifin (Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2022	Ahiruddin Al-Had bin Haji Arrifin (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedAccused was convicted on three charges and sentenced to 13 years, three months and four weeks’ imprisonment.
2	Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking 11 Jan 2017 MUHAMMAD BIN ABDULLAH (Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2017	MUHAMMAD BIN ABDULLAH (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; mandatory death sentence upheld.
3	PP v Iskandar bin Rahmat: Murder Conviction for Double Homicide at Hillside Drive 03 Dec 2015 Iskandar bin Rahmat (Defendant)Lost	03 Dec 2015	Iskandar bin Rahmat (Defendant): Convicted of murder; death sentence imposedThe defendant was convicted of murder under section 300(a) of the Penal Code and sentenced to death.
4	Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate under Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Oct 2015 Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali (Appellant)Lost	04 Oct 2015	Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision to deny leave for judicial review was dismissed.
5	Muhammad Ridzuan v AG: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under MDA 11 Sep 2014 Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali (Applicant)Lost	11 Sep 2014	Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed. No order as to costs was made. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai: Rape, Attempted Murder, House-Trespass 08 Apr 2013 Ravindran Annamalai (Defendant)Lost	08 Apr 2013	Ravindran Annamalai (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted of all charges, save that the 3rd charge was amended.
7	Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor: Clarification of Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Unused Material 25 Aug 2011 Muhammad bin Kadar (Appellant, Respondent)Neutral	25 Aug 2011	Muhammad bin Kadar (Appellant, Respondent): Clarification of judgmentThe court clarified the scope of the Prosecution's duty of disclosure.
8	Public Prosecutor v AFR: Culpable Homicide and Child Abuse Sentencing 26 May 2011 AFR (Respondent)Lost	26 May 2011	AFR (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced from six years' imprisonment to ten years' imprisonment, plus ten strokes of the cane.
9	Public Prosecutor v AFR: Culpable Homicide of a Child Under Section 304(b) of the Penal Code 10 Aug 2010 AFR (Defendant)Lost	10 Aug 2010	AFR (Defendant): Convicted of culpable homicideConvicted of culpable homicide under s 299 and punishable under s 304(b) of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.
10	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Fadzly bin Din: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Apr 2010 Mohamad Fadzly bin Din (Defendant)Lost	19 Apr 2010	Mohamad Fadzly bin Din (Defendant): Convicted as chargedAccused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
11	PP v Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus: Murder Conviction at Viz@Holland Construction Site 07 Jan 2010 Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Defendant)Lost	07 Jan 2010	Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused is found guilty and convicted on the charge against him, and shall suffer the mandatory death sentence.
12	Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation 18 Jun 2009 Tharema Vejayan s/o Govindasamy (Defense)Lost	18 Jun 2009	Tharema Vejayan s/o Govindasamy (Defense): ConvictedAccused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
13	Public Prosecutor v Ismil bin Kadar: Murder, Robbery, and Common Intention 06 Apr 2009 Muhammad bin Kadar (Defendant)Neutral	06 Apr 2009	Muhammad bin Kadar (Defendant): Judgment reservedThe court reserved judgment.
14	Chiam Toon Hong v Ong Soo Yong: Dispute over Rescission of Land Sale Contract 27 Jun 2004 Chiam Toon Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jun 2004	Chiam Toon Hong (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for a declaration that the sale and purchase agreement had been rescinded and for an order that the caveat be removed was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader: Rape under Penal Code s 376(1) 14 Jun 2004 Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader (Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2004	Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader (Defendant): Convicted on first charge of rapeThe accused was convicted on the first charge of rape.