Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader: Rape under Penal Code s 376(1)

In Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader, the High Court of Singapore heard the case against Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader, a Bangladeshi national, who was charged with two counts of rape against Y, an Indonesian maid, under Section 376(1) of the Penal Code. The alleged offences occurred at 45 Jalan K between 10.30pm on 4 May 2003 and 2.30am on 5 May 2003. Tay Yong Kwang J convicted the accused on the first count of rape but acquitted him on the second count.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused convicted on first charge of rape and acquitted on second charge of rape.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader was charged with rape under s 376(1) of the Penal Code. The court convicted him on one count of rape.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyConviction on first charge of rapePartialG Kannan, Lee Jwee Nguan
Akbar Late Md Hossain HowladerDefendantIndividualConvicted on first charge of rape, Acquitted on second charge of rapeLost, WonAziz Tayabali Samiwalla, Rajan Supramaniam

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
G KannanDeputy Public Prosecutors
Lee Jwee NguanDeputy Public Prosecutors
Aziz Tayabali SamiwallaAziz Tayabali and Associates
Rajan SupramaniamTan See Swan and Co

4. Facts

  1. The accused, a 34-year-old Bangladeshi national, was working in Singapore for Hong Tar Engineering Pte Ltd.
  2. The victim, a 25-year-old Indonesian lady, was working as a maid at 45 Jalan K.
  3. The alleged rape occurred between 10.30pm on 4 May 2003 and 2.30am on 5 May 2003 at 45 Jalan K.
  4. The accused had a prior sexual relationship with the previous maid at 45 Jalan K.
  5. Spermatozoa were found in the endocervical swab taken from the victim.
  6. DNA matching the accused’s DNA profile was found on the vaginal swabs, towel, and bedsheet.
  7. The accused initially denied knowing the previous maid, A, in his statements to the police.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader, CC 3/2004, [2004] SGHC 128

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Y arrived in Singapore from Indonesia
Y was employed as a domestic maid by PY
A left for Indonesia after her two-year contract expired
Y saw a Bangladeshi man cycling back and forth on the road in front of 45 Jalan K
Y saw the accused seated on the stone bench across the road opposite 47 Jalan K
PT’s daughter and her husband went to 45 Jalan K to take PT out for dinner
Alleged rape occurred between 10.30pm on 4 May 2003 and 2.30am on 5 May 2003
Y informed PS that an intruder had entered her room during the night
Y was sent to the National University Hospital for a medical examination
The police arrested the accused at his place of work at the Skytech Building
Y attended an identification parade at the Criminal Investigation Department and identified the accused as the man who raped her
Accused made first statement pursuant to s 122(6) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Accused made another statement to the investigating officer
Accused was charged with a second charge of rape against Y
S left the employ of the residents of 47 Jalan K
Sentence to take effect from 12 May 2003
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Whether sexual intercourse was consensual
    • Outcome: The court found that the sexual intercourse was not consensual.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Whether there were one or two occasions of intercourse
    • Outcome: The court was not convinced beyond reasonable doubt that there were two acts of penetration.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Appropriate sentence to be passed in light of aggravating factors present
    • Outcome: The court sentenced the accused to 13 years’ imprisonment and 14 strokes of the cane.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Rape

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Rape
  • Sentencing

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ang Jwee Herng v PPHigh CourtYes[2001] 2 SLR 474SingaporeCited regarding adverse inference if the Prosecution withholds evidence.
Chua Keem Long v PPHigh CourtYes[1996] 1 SLR 510SingaporeCited regarding adverse inference if the Prosecution withholds evidence.
Fun Seong Cheng v PPHigh CourtYes[1997] 3 SLR 523SingaporeCited regarding challenge on accuracy and not admissibility, no voir dire was necessary
Chia Kim Heng Frederick v PPCourt of Criminal AppealYes[1992] 1 SLR 361SingaporeCited for guidelines on sentencing.
Regina v Lucas (Ruth)Queen's BenchYes[1981] QB 720England and WalesCited for the four criteria for lies indicating guilt.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) s 376(1)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 157(c)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed) s 122(6)Singapore
Evidence Act s 116 illustration (g)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Rape
  • Consent
  • Penetration
  • DNA
  • Spermatozoa
  • Maid
  • Intrusion
  • False accusations

15.2 Keywords

  • Rape
  • Sexual Assault
  • Criminal Law
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Penal Code
  • Consent

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Rape

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Sentencing
  • Rape