Rajashree Rajan

Rajashree Rajan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accident Reconstruction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Expenses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fibromyalgia	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Intervention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajashree Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajashree Rajan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Just Law LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	China Taiping Insurance v Low Yi Lian: Work Injury Compensation Claim Without Grant of Representation(Jan 2018) Selvaganthan v Cheung: Road Accident, Negligence, and Spinal Injuries(Sep 2015) Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome(May 2015)
HDB (Legal Group)	1 cases	17% of cases	Jeyaretnam v Malayaperumal: Constructive Trusts & Equitable Lien on HDB Flat(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajashree Rajan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.6 parties avg	3.6	67%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	17%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajashree Rajan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	32,955.12	8,238.784 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jeyaretnam v Malayaperumal: Constructive Trusts & Equitable Lien on HDB Flat 29 Aug 2019 Housing and Development Board (Other)Neutral	29 Aug 2019	Housing and Development Board (Other): NeutralThe Housing and Development Board was a non-party. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	China Taiping Insurance v Low Yi Lian: Work Injury Compensation Claim Without Grant of Representation 03 Jan 2018 CLUB SONATA PTE LTD (Applicant)Lost	03 Jan 2018	CLUB SONATA PTE LTD (Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Selvaganthan v Cheung: Road Accident, Negligence, and Spinal Injuries 29 Sep 2015 CHEUNG MAN WAI (Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2015	CHEUNG MAN WAI (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for damages in the sums of $7,000 as general damages and $4,950 as special damages. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 18 May 2015 V I P Hotel (Defendant)Lost	18 May 2015	V I P Hotel (Defendant): Partial LossDefendant ordered to pay $9,005.115 to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction: Negligence in Construction Site Accident 08 Sep 2014 Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	08 Sep 2014	Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liability established; damages reduced by 50% due to Plaintiff's contributory negligence.The Defendant was found liable for negligence, but the damages payable are reduced by 50% due to the Plaintiff's contributory negligence. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
6	Tan Boon Heng v Lau Pang Cheng David: Principles Governing Review of Registrar's Decision on Damages Assessment 03 Sep 2013 Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	03 Sep 2013	Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $12,000 to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.