Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction: Negligence in Construction Site Accident

In Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another, the High Court of Singapore heard a negligence claim brought by Chen Qiangshi against Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd following a construction site accident on 26 December 2012. Chen, an employee of Hong Fei CDY Construction, sustained severe injuries when a rebar cage collapsed on him. The court, presided over by George Wei JC, found both defendants negligent but reduced the recoverable damages by 50% due to Chen's contributory negligence. The court determined that the accident resulted from improper rigging of the rebar cage and inadequate supervision, but also found that Chen's actions contributed to the incident.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff; liability reduced by 50% due to contributory negligence.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Chen Qiangshi sued Hong Fei CDY Construction for negligence after a construction site accident. The court found both defendants liable but reduced damages by 50% due to contributory negligence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Chen QiangshiPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for Plaintiff; liability reduced by 50% due to contributory negligence.PartialNamasivayam Srinivasan
Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte LtdDefendantCorporationLiability established; damages reduced by 50% due to Plaintiff's contributory negligence.PartialAppoo Ramesh, Rajashree Rajan
Evan Lim & Co Pte LtdDefendantCorporationLiability established; damages reduced by 50% due to Plaintiff's contributory negligence.PartialAppoo Ramesh, Rajashree Rajan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
George WeiJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Namasivayam SrinivasanHoh Law Corporation
Appoo RameshJust Law LLC
Rajashree RajanJust Law LLC

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was injured when a rebar cage collapsed on him at a construction site.
  2. The accident occurred during the relocation of a rebar cage installed in the wrong position.
  3. The rebar cage was improperly rigged up by the plaintiff.
  4. The lifting supervisor was not present at the site during the relocation operation.
  5. The rigger/signalman instructed the tower crane operator to tauten the hoist chains.
  6. The plaintiff removed the remaining wire ties after the hoist chains were tautened.
  7. The plaintiff was an experienced rebar worker.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another, Suit No 540 of 2013, [2014] SGHC 177

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accident occurred at construction site
Suit filed
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found both defendants negligent.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Breach of duty of care
      • Causation
      • Standard of care
  2. Contributory Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the plaintiff contributorily negligent and reduced the damages by 50%.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Vicarious Liability
    • Outcome: The court found both defendants vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Construction Accident Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Workplace Safety

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Chandran a/l Subbiah v Dockers Marine Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2010] 1 SLR 786SingaporeCited regarding employer liability in two modes: primary or secondary.
Awang bin Dollah v Shun Shing Construction & Engineering Co Ltd and other appealsCourt of AppealYes[1997] 2 SLR(R) 746SingaporeCited regarding the definition of 'employee' in the context of vicarious liability.
Toh Siew Kee v Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdCourt of AppealYes[2013] 3 SLR 284SingaporeCited for subsuming occupier’s liability under the general tort of negligence as expounded on by the Court of Appeal in Singapore in Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency [2007] 4 SLR(R) 100
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology AgencyCourt of AppealYes[2007] 4 SLR(R) 100SingaporeCited for the general principles on when a duty of care arises under the tort of negligence.
Tan Juay Pah v Kimly Construction Pte Ltd and othersCourt of AppealYes[2012] 2 SLR 549SingaporeCited for principles on a statutory duty shaping the existence of a duty of care.
Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd v Moh Seng Cranes Pte Ltd and othersCourt of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 360SingaporeCited for the extent to which the WSH Framework affects the duty of care owed by the main contractor and a subcontractor to persons present on the construction site.
Tesa Tape Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Wing Seng Logistics Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2006] 3 SLR(R) 116SingaporeCited for the standard of care expected of the defendant.
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths (Liverpool) LimitedHouse of LordsYes[1947] AC 1United KingdomCited regarding the temporary transfer of services of an employee to another party.
Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd and othersEnglish Court of AppealYes[2006] QB 510United KingdomCited regarding dual vicarious liability.
Karuppan Bhoomides v Port of Singapore AuthorityPrivy CouncilYes[1978] 1 WLR 189SingaporeCited regarding dual vicarious liability.
Parno v SC Marine Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1999] 3 SLR(R) 377SingaporeCited regarding contributory negligence.
Froom v ButcherCourt of AppealYes[1976] QB 286United KingdomCited regarding contributory negligence.
Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian s/o RangasamyHigh CourtYes[2004] 1 SLR(R) 628SingaporeCited regarding apportionment being an exercise in discretion.
Dennis Toole v Bolton Metropolitan Borough CouncilEnglish Court of AppealYes[2002] EWCA Civ 588United KingdomCited regarding contributory negligence in breach of statutory duty cases.
Staveley Iron & Chemical Co Ltd v JonesHouse of LordsYes[1956] AC 627United KingdomCited regarding contributory negligence in cases of breach of statutory duty.
Sherlock v Chester City CouncilEnglish Court of AppealYes[2004] EWCA Civ 201United KingdomCited regarding conscious acceptance of risk by an employee.
Zheng Yu Shan v Lian Beng Construction (1988) Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2009] 2 SLR(R) 587SingaporeCited regarding an employer's duty to provide a safe system of work.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Workplace Safety and Health Act (Cap 354A, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore
Contributory Negligence and Personal Injuries Act (Cap 54, 2002 Rev Ed)Singapore
Workplace Safety and Health (Construction) Regulations 2007 (Cap 354A)Singapore
Workplace Safety and Health (Operation of Cranes) Regulations 2011 (Cap 354A)Singapore
Section 12(2) of the WSHASingapore
Section 3(1) of the Contributory Negligence ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Rebar cage
  • Lifting operation
  • Hoist chains
  • Lifting supervisor
  • Rigger
  • Signalman
  • Contributory negligence
  • Workplace Safety and Health Act
  • Lifting plan
  • Wire ties

15.2 Keywords

  • Construction accident
  • Negligence
  • Workplace safety
  • Rebar cage
  • Contributory negligence
  • Singapore High Court

16. Subjects

  • Construction Dispute
  • Negligence
  • Workplace Safety

17. Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Negligence
  • Workplace Safety and Health Law
  • Tort Law