Ramalingam Kasi

Ramalingam Kasi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and estate administration. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 7% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Back charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Overseas Test Centres	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramalingam Kasi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramalingam Kasi has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Raj Kumar & Rama	9 cases	60% of cases	TQN v TQO: Division of Matrimonial Home in Divorce Proceedings(Aug 2016) Kua Tee Beng v Ye Caiyan: Recovery of Gifts, Undue Influence, and Resulting Trust Dispute(Feb 2015) Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute(Sep 2013)
Rajkumar & Kasi	1 cases	7% of cases	Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts(Jun 2016)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	7% of cases	Salleh Bin Awang v Zakiah Bte Arshad: Resulting Trust, Presumption of Advancement & Joint Bank Accounts(Apr 2003)
Derrick Ravi Partnership	1 cases	7% of cases	OCBC v Tan Geok Ser: Guarantee, Loan Agreement & Bank's Duty of Good Faith(Dec 2000)
Raj Kumar & Ruma	1 cases	7% of cases	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Security for Costs Application(Sep 2001)
S H Tan & Associates	1 cases	7% of cases	United Eng Contractors v L & M Concrete: Rectification Works Dispute(Apr 2000)
Raj Kumar	1 cases	7% of cases	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Overseas Training Centre Dispute(Oct 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramalingam Kasi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	33%
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	27%
Won	62.7 parties avg	2.7	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramalingam Kasi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(33%)	33%
Partial	4(27%)	27%
Won	6(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	81,950,374.12	8,195,037.4110 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TQN v TQO: Division of Matrimonial Home in Divorce Proceedings 03 Aug 2016 TQN (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Aug 2016	TQN (Plaintiff): Partial Division of Matrimonial HomeReceived 33% share of the Matrimonial Home. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts 13 Jun 2016 Lai Hoon Woon (Plaintiff)Won	13 Jun 2016	Lai Hoon Woon (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; The first defendant shall execute such documents as may be necessary for the registration of the Plaintiff as tenant-in-common of the Boon Lay Property with a 51% share, as an executor and a trustee of the Deceased’s estate. The first defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff $42,403 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), that being the unpaid balance on the Loan.
3	Kua Tee Beng v Ye Caiyan: Recovery of Gifts, Undue Influence, and Resulting Trust Dispute 25 Feb 2015 Ye Caiyan (Defendant)Won	25 Feb 2015	Ye Caiyan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded to the Defendant, to be agreed or taxed.
4	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens & Overseas Training Center Dispute 24 Sep 2013 Welltech Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	24 Sep 2013	Welltech Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Welltech; the court agreed that Bangladesh was the more appropriate forum. Costs awarded to Welltech.
5	Virsagi Management v Welltech Construction: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Overseas Training Centre Dispute 15 Oct 2012 Welltech Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Oct 2012	Welltech Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application GrantedWelltech's application for a stay of proceedings was granted. Welltech was awarded costs for Summons 829. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Chua Tian Chu v Chin Bay Ching: Specific Performance & Liquidated Damages in Property Sale 19 May 2011 Tjia Mui Kui (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2011	Tjia Mui Kui (Defendant): Specific performance ordered, claim for rectification costs allowed, claim for liquidated damages dismissed in partSpecific performance of the agreement was ordered. The claim for rectification costs was allowed in the agreed sum of $410,000. The claim for liquidated damages was dismissed in part, except for the sum of $141,922.19 already deducted. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Salleh Bin Awang v Zakiah Bte Arshad: Resulting Trust, Presumption of Advancement & Joint Bank Accounts 13 Apr 2003 Zalipah Bte Arshad (Plaintiff)Won	13 Apr 2003	Zalipah Bte Arshad (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiffs’ claim allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
8	Chidambaram v Alagappa: Trust Fund Overdraw & Estate Distribution Dispute 09 Sep 2002 Alagappan Arunachalam (Claimant)Lost	09 Sep 2002	Alagappan Arunachalam (Claimant): Claim DismissedArunachalam claims in the Originating Summons against both Chidambaram and Subramanian are also dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Security for Costs Application 24 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	24 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal LostThe appeal against the order to set aside security for costs was lost.
10	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Security for Costs Application 24 Sep 2001 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	24 Sep 2001	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal LostL&M's appeal was dismissed, and the order for security of costs was set aside.
11	OCBC v Tan Geok Ser: Guarantee, Loan Agreement & Bank's Duty of Good Faith 01 Dec 2000 Kon Hong Shin (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2000	Kon Hong Shin (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment against DefendantFinal judgment awarded to the plaintiffs with costs against the defendant on an indemnity basis. The judgment amount is based on the loan of S$80.8m. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
12	Jaspal Singh v Melville Marie-Anne: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Apportionment under Women's Charter 28 Sep 2000 Melville Marie-Anne (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	28 Sep 2000	Melville Marie-Anne (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal partially allowedAppeal partially allowed; 35% share of matrimonial assets awarded. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
13	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng: Arbitration Clause Incorporation & Waiver Dispute 10 Aug 2000 United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	10 Aug 2000	United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim not stayedUnited Eng's counterclaim will proceed in court.
14	Singapore Insulating Glass v Newspaper Seng: Breach of Contract & Land Sale Consent 19 May 2000 Singapore Insulating Glass Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 May 2000	Singapore Insulating Glass Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages and other reliefs for breach of contract was dismissed.
15	United Eng Contractors v L & M Concrete: Rectification Works Dispute 27 Apr 2000 United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Apr 2000	United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the reduced sum of $287,971.12 after set-off. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.