Ramli Salehkon

Ramli Salehkon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attempt to Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramli Salehkon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramli Salehkon has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramli & Co	6 cases	75% of cases	PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2003) Azman bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention(Oct 2002) PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium(Aug 2002)
James Masih & Co	1 cases	13% of cases	PP v Saeng-Un Udom: Murder Conviction for Fatal Head Injuries Inflicted with Metal Rod during Quarrel(Jan 2001)
Ramli and Co	1 cases	13% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Shahary bin Sulaiman: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramli Salehkon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.0 parties avg	3.0	75%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramli Salehkon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(75%)	75%
Partial	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Shahary bin Sulaiman: Trafficking of Diamorphine 23 Jun 2004 Shahary bin Sulaiman (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2004	Shahary bin Sulaiman (Defendant): ConvictedAccused found guilty and convicted; mandatory death sentence imposed.
2	PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jan 2003 Rosdi Bin Pungot (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2003	Rosdi Bin Pungot (Defendant): Guilty verdict; mandatory death sentence imposedThe court found the second accused guilty and imposed the mandatory death sentence.
3	Azman bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention 13 Oct 2002 Ruzaini bin Ajis (Appellant)Lost	13 Oct 2002	Ruzaini bin Ajis (Appellant): Appeal DismissedRuzaini bin Ajis's appeal against his conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.
4	PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium 11 Aug 2002 Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh (Defendant)Lost	11 Aug 2002	Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh (Defendant): GuiltyMohamed Isnin bin Saleh was found guilty of drug trafficking.
5	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Noor bin Abdullah: Trafficking of Diamorphine 04 Jun 2001 Mohamad Noor Bin Abdullah (Defendant)Lost	04 Jun 2001	Mohamad Noor Bin Abdullah (Defendant): Accused found guiltyAccused sentenced to death.
6	Saeng-Un Udom v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Murder Conviction After Disputed Forensic Evidence 11 May 2001 Saeng-Un Udom (Appellant)Partial	11 May 2001	Saeng-Un Udom (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partAppeal allowed; murder conviction set aside; convicted of attempted murder.
7	Saeng-Un Udom v PP: Murder Charge Reduced to Attempted Murder Due to Forensic Evidence 11 May 2001 Saeng-Un Udom (Appellant)Partial	11 May 2001	Saeng-Un Udom (Appellant): Appeal allowed; convicted of attempted murderAppeal against murder conviction allowed; convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to ten years imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	PP v Saeng-Un Udom: Murder Conviction for Fatal Head Injuries Inflicted with Metal Rod during Quarrel 10 Jan 2001 Saeng-Un Udom (Defendant)Lost	10 Jan 2001	Saeng-Un Udom (Defendant): Convicted of MurderAccused was found guilty of murder under Section 300 (a) of the Penal Code and sentenced to death.