Ravi s/o Madasamy

Ravi s/o Madasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 40 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and costs. Their track record shows a 5.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 18% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated expertise across 80 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	28 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 28 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	23 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 23 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	20 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	19 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	16 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equal protection of the law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to life and personal liberty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confiscation and forfeiture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prima Facie Case	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Suspicion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prohibiting Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Search and Seizure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the judiciary	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (University Staff)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Election Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Parliamentary Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prison Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adduction of new evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Treatment Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ravi s/o Madasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ravi s/o Madasamy has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 22 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Carson Law Chambers	22 cases	55% of cases	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022) Lee Chye Chong v SBS Transit: Transfer of Proceedings & Employment Act Interpretation(Jun 2021) Syed Suhail v PP: Personal Costs Order Against Counsel for Abuse of Process in Criminal Review Application(May 2021)
K K Cheng Law LLC	6 cases	15% of cases	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications(Jun 2022) Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Allegations of Racial Discrimination in Drug Trafficking Prosecutions(Dec 2021) Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Personal Liability of Solicitor for Costs in Judicial Review(Nov 2021)
L F Violet Netto	5 cases	13% of cases	Madan Mohan Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Singapore Prison Service Hair Grooming Policy(Feb 2015) Tey Tsun Hang v National University of Singapore: Judicial Review of Dismissal(Jan 2015) Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of ICA's REP Cancellation and PR Status(Nov 2014)
Independent Practitioner	2 cases	5% of cases	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Personal Costs Orders Against Defence Counsel(May 2022) Ravi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review, Legal Professional Privilege & Search/Seizure(Oct 2020)
KK Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	5% of cases	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent(May 2022) Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Intervention in Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Penal Code s 300(a)(Sep 2021)
LF Violet Netto	2 cases	5% of cases	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion(Jul 2013) Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary(May 2011)
Messrs L F Violet Netto	1 cases	3% of cases	Arun Kaliamurthy v PP: Riot, Sub Judice Rule & Fair Trial(Jun 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ravi s/o Madasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.3
Complex Cases: 7 (18%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Lost	3312.8 parties avg	12.8	83%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	10%
Won	213.1 parties avg	13.1	5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	132.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	1412.8 parties avg	12.8
2022	418.1 parties avg	18.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ravi s/o Madasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	33(80%)	80%
Neutral	1(2%)	2%
Partial	4(10%)	10%
Won	2(5%)	5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	535,536.27	41,195.1013 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 3 cases (75.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	14 1121	Lost: 11 cases (78.6%) Partial: 2 cases (14.3%) Won: 1 cases (7.1%)
2021	14 11111	Lost: 11 cases (78.6%) Neutral: 1 cases (7.1%) Partial: 1 cases (7.1%) Won: 1 cases (7.1%)
2022	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 40 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications 22 Jun 2022 Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Jun 2022	Hamzah bin Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Personal Costs Orders Against Defence Counsel 25 May 2022 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	25 May 2022	Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent 11 May 2022 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Plaintiff)Lost	11 May 2022	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Plaintiff): Costs ordered against plaintiffs' counselsCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Tan Seng Kee (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Tan Seng Kee (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
5	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Allegations of Racial Discrimination in Drug Trafficking Prosecutions 01 Dec 2021 Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Dec 2021	Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
6	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Personal Liability of Solicitor for Costs in Judicial Review 29 Nov 2021 Pannir Selvam Pranthaman (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Nov 2021	Pannir Selvam Pranthaman (Plaintiff): Costs to be borne by counselCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff.
7	Kanesan s/o Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Consumption and Possession Conviction 28 Nov 2021 Kanesan s/o Ramasamy (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2021	Kanesan s/o Ramasamy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
8	Iskandar v Law Society: Appeal on Disciplinary Proceedings for Defense Team in Double Murder Case 18 Nov 2021 Iskandar bin Rahmat (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	18 Nov 2021	Iskandar bin Rahmat (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe Appellant's appeal against the Judgment was dismissed.
9	Koh Rong Gui v Public Prosecutor: Constitutional Challenge to Mandatory Treatment Order Provisions 17 Nov 2021 Koh Rong Gui (Appellant)Partial	17 Nov 2021	Koh Rong Gui (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partThe constitutional challenge against the MTO Provisions failed. The case was remitted for further clarification regarding compliance with section 339(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
10	Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Intervention in Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Penal Code s 300(a) 20 Sep 2021 Iskandar bin Rahmat (Applicant)Lost	20 Sep 2021	Iskandar bin Rahmat (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to intervene in CCA 36 was dismissed.
11	Lee Chye Chong v SBS Transit: Transfer of Proceedings & Employment Act Interpretation 09 Jun 2021 Mohamad Sani bin Din (Applicant)Won	09 Jun 2021	Mohamad Sani bin Din (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application to transfer the case to the High Court was allowed.
12	Syed Suhail v PP: Personal Costs Order Against Counsel for Abuse of Process in Criminal Review Application 13 May 2021 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant)Lost	13 May 2021	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant): Costs order against counselPersonal costs order of $5,000 against his counsel, Mr. Ravi (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Norasharee bin Gous v Public Prosecutor: Re-opening of Appeal for Drug Trafficking 20 Apr 2021 Norasharee Bin Gous (Applicant)Lost	20 Apr 2021	Norasharee Bin Gous (Applicant): Application to re-open the appeal dismissedThe Court dismissed the application to re-open the appeal.
14	Nazeri bin Lajim v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking Conviction 19 Apr 2021 Nazeri bin Lajim (Applicant)Lost	19 Apr 2021	Nazeri bin Lajim (Applicant): Application dismissed summarilyThe court dismissed the application for review summarily, finding no sufficient material to conclude that there had been a miscarriage of justice.
15	Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Apr 2021 Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Applicant)Lost	04 Apr 2021	Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to review the earlier decision was dismissed.
16	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions for Disclosure of Statements 17 Mar 2021 Augustin, Daniel De Costa (Applicant)Lost	17 Mar 2021	Augustin, Daniel De Costa (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for production of statements was dismissed.
17	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Execution Scheduling & Equal Protection 07 Feb 2021 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant)Lost	07 Feb 2021	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application for judicial review was dismissed.
18	Iskandar v Law Society: Appealability of Judge's Decision on Disciplinary Review under Legal Profession Act 07 Jan 2021 Iskandar bin Rahmat (Appellant, Applicant)Neutral	07 Jan 2021	Iskandar bin Rahmat (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal not struck outApplication to strike out the appeal was dismissed; the substantive appeal will be heard in due course.
19	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Execution Scheduling and Equal Protection 22 Dec 2020 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	22 Dec 2020	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; leave granted to commence judicial review proceedings solely on the scheduling ground.
20	Lim Tean v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Police Investigations 07 Dec 2020 Lim Tean (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2020	Lim Tean (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review was dismissed with costs fixed at S$7,500 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Gobi a/l Avedian v Public Prosecutor: Review of MDA Conviction Based on Wilful Blindness 18 Oct 2020 Gobi a/l Avedian (Applicant)Won	18 Oct 2020	Gobi a/l Avedian (Applicant): Conviction on capital charge set asideThe Court of Appeal set aside Gobi a/l Avedian's conviction on the capital charge.
22	Syed Suhail v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing 15 Oct 2020 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	15 Oct 2020	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Applicant, Appellant): Review application dismissedThe applicant's review application was dismissed as he failed to produce sufficient material to demonstrate a miscarriage of justice.
23	Ravi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review, Legal Professional Privilege & Search/Seizure 12 Oct 2020 Ravi s/o Madasamy (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Oct 2020	Ravi s/o Madasamy (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff’s application for leave to commence judicial review under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court is dismissed.
24	Moad Fadzir Bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing 11 Oct 2020 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Applicant)Lost	11 Oct 2020	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Applicant): Leave application dismissedThe applicant's application for leave to make a review application was dismissed.
25	Public Prosecutor v Norasharee bin Gous: Misuse of Drugs Act & Alibi Defence 13 Sep 2020 Norasharee Bin Gous (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2020	Norasharee Bin Gous (Defendant): Conviction UpheldThe court upheld the original conviction of the accused. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Yuen Ye Ming v Public Prosecutor: Extension of Time for Criminal Reference & Enhanced Punishment under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Aug 2020 Yuen Ye Ming (Applicant)Lost	18 Aug 2020	Yuen Ye Ming (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to apply for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
27	Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Election During COVID-19 Pandemic 29 Jun 2020 Daniel De Costa Augustin (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2020	Daniel De Costa Augustin (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant's claims were rejected.
28	Daniel De Costa Augustin v Public Prosecutor: Constitutional Law, Equality Before Law 01 Jun 2020 Daniel De Costa Augustin (Applicant)Lost	01 Jun 2020	Daniel De Costa Augustin (Applicant): Motion DeniedMotion denied; no monetary amount awarded.
29	Lim Anthony v Gao Wenxi: Oppression, Contract, and Misrepresentation in Shareholder Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Aussino International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	05 Apr 2020	Aussino International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCompany's counterclaim allowed in part for $12,036.27 against Anthony (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails 29 Mar 2020 Tan Seng Kee (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Tan Seng Kee (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to declare s 377A unconstitutional was dismissed.
31	Gobi a/l Avedian v Attorney-General: Judicial Review & Equal Protection of Law 12 Feb 2020 Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2020	Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed.
32	Tan Liang Joo John v Attorney-General: Election Eligibility & Criminal Contempt 05 Nov 2019 Tan Liang Joo John (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2019	Tan Liang Joo John (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for a declaration that he is not disqualified from standing for election was dismissed.
33	Madan Mohan Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Singapore Prison Service Hair Grooming Policy 24 Feb 2015 Madan Mohan Singh (Applicant)Lost	24 Feb 2015	Madan Mohan Singh (Applicant): Application DismissedThe originating summons was struck out due to lack of locus standi and delay.
34	Tey Tsun Hang v National University of Singapore: Judicial Review of Dismissal 13 Jan 2015 Tey Tsun Hang (Applicant)Lost	13 Jan 2015	Tey Tsun Hang (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to bring judicial review proceedings dismissed.
35	Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of ICA's REP Cancellation and PR Status 30 Nov 2014 Tey Tsun Hang (Applicant)Dismissed	30 Nov 2014	Tey Tsun Hang (Applicant): Application DismissedThe originating summons was struck out as an abuse of process.
36	Public Prosecutor v Prabagaran: Drug Importation & Presumption of Knowledge 02 Nov 2014 PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Defendant)Lost	02 Nov 2014	PRABAGARAN A/L SRIVIJAYAN (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged.
37	Arun Kaliamurthy v PP: Riot, Sub Judice Rule & Fair Trial 22 Jun 2014 Arun Kaliamurthy and others (Applicant)Lost	22 Jun 2014	Arun Kaliamurthy and others (Applicant): Costs ordered to be paid to the prosecutionThe accused persons were ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings to the prosecution. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel & Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation 27 May 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	27 May 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe criminal motion filed by the Applicant was dismissed.
39	Vellama v AG: Constitutionality of Vacant Seat & Prime Minister's Discretion 04 Jul 2013 Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2013	Vellama d/o Marie Muthu (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. The court ordered each party to bear their own costs.
40	Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Judiciary 26 May 2011 Shadrake Alan (Appellant)Partial	26 May 2011	Shadrake Alan (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; sentence affirmed.