Reuben Tan Wei Jer

Reuben Tan Wei Jer is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in agency law and settlement agreement. Their track record shows a 27.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reopening of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reuben Tan Wei Jer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Reuben Tan Wei Jer has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	10 cases	100% of cases	Dialectic PR LLC v Brilliante Resources: Breach of Contract & Lifting Corporate Veil(Feb 2023) BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms(Aug 2022) Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Reuben Tan Wei Jer's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 5 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	34.4 parties avg	4.4	30%
Won	36.3 parties avg	6.3	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	35.4 parties avg	5.4
2020	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Reuben Tan Wei Jer's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(45%)	45%
Partial	3(27%)	27%
Won	3(27%)	27%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	401,554.14	66,925.696 cases	6
USD	6,509,346.56	6,509,346.561 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dialectic PR LLC v Brilliante Resources: Breach of Contract & Lifting Corporate Veil 16 Feb 2023 Dialectic Distribution LLC (Plaintiff)Partial	16 Feb 2023	Dialectic Distribution LLC (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in partClaim against the 1st Defendant for breach of contract allowed in part. The 1st Defendant is to pay the Plaintiffs the sum of US$3,254,673.28.
2	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms 25 Aug 2022 Kim Byung Gun (Defendant)Partial	25 Aug 2022	Kim Byung Gun (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for S$331,054.14 and KRW41,146,120. Assumed SGD, as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity 18 May 2020 Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	18 May 2020	Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Alphire Group Pte Ltd to pay costs of $25,000 to the respondent.
5	Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Derivative Action, Directors' Duties & Companies Act 27 Apr 2020 Ong Kim Siong (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2020	Ong Kim Siong (Defendant): Leave granted to PlaintiffLeave was granted to the plaintiff to bring an action on behalf of Trillion against the directors for breach of duties.
6	Law Chau Loon v Alphire Group: Settlement Agreement & Implied Authority 26 Nov 2019 Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	26 Nov 2019	Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed; the court declared that the settlement agreement made on 2 February 2019 was valid and binding on Alphire. Costs of S$7,500 awarded to the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	BXY v BXX: Dispute Over Tribunal Jurisdiction in SIAC Arbitration 18 Jul 2019 BYB (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2019	BYB (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed.
8	Ma Wai Fong Kathryn v Trillion Investment: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds 19 Mar 2019 Patrick Wong Haw Yeong (Respondent)Won	19 Mar 2019	Patrick Wong Haw Yeong (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal to wind up Double Ace Trading Company (Private) Limited was allowed.
9	Evan Lim v MWA Capital: Reopening Loan Transactions under Moneylenders Act 12 Nov 2018 Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2018	Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $38,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the Liquidators of Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation). Costs of the Liquidators’ joinder application fixed at $10,000 (both inclusive of disbursements) in favour of the Liquidators. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Resorts World v Lee Fook Kheun: Casino Credit Facility, Intoxication & Contract Rescission 30 Jul 2018 Lee Fook Kheun (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2018	Lee Fook Kheun (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for the return of sums paid to RWS is dismissed (currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).