Rimplejit Kaur

Rimplejit Kaur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	14 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	14 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	14 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	12 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equal protection of the law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fundamental liberties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right to life and personal liberty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hypomanic episode of bipolar disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rimplejit Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rimplejit Kaur has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	16 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Ravi Madasamy: Contempt of Court under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act(Nov 2023) Attorney-General v Ravi Madasamy: Contempt of Court & Administration of Justice (Protection) Act(Mar 2023) A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rimplejit Kaur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Won	122.2 parties avg	2.2	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	43.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rimplejit Kaur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(6%)	6%
Other	1(6%)	6%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	12(75%)	75%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Other: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Ravi Madasamy: Contempt of Court under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 07 Nov 2023 The Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	07 Nov 2023	The Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantMr. Ravi was found liable for nine instances of contempt and sentenced to imprisonment.
2	Attorney-General v Ravi Madasamy: Contempt of Court & Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 30 Mar 2023 The Attorney-General (Applicant)Partial	30 Mar 2023	The Attorney-General (Applicant): Successful in partThe Attorney-General's application was successful in part, with Mr. Ravi found guilty of several allegations of contempt.
3	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's motion.
4	Muhammad Abdul Hadi bin Haron v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Wilful Blindness 02 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed.
5	Nazeri bin Lajim v Attorney-General: Constitutional Rights, Equal Protection, and Stay of Execution 20 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed in favor of the Attorney-General.
6	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed.
7	PP v Wan Azasar: Misuse of Drugs Act Importation - Diamorphine, Methamphetamine, Cannabis 17 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction on all chargesThe accused was found guilty on all three charges of importing controlled drugs.
8	Public Prosecutor v A Steven s/o Paul Raj: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of trafficking in diamorphine.
9	PP v S K Murugan: Voluntariness of Statements & Admissibility in Drug Trafficking Retrial 29 Jul 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	29 Jul 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Statements made involuntarily and should not be admitted into evidence.The court held that the statements were made involuntarily and should not be admitted into evidence.
10	Nazeri bin Lajim v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking Conviction 19 Apr 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Apr 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application for review.
11	Muhammad Abdul Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment of Trafficking 22 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals by Muhammad Abdul Hadi bin Haron and Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid were dismissed.
12	Yuen Ye Ming v Public Prosecutor: Extension of Time for Criminal Reference & Enhanced Punishment under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Aug 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Aug 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Applicant's application for extension of time was dismissed.
13	PP v Muhammad Abdul Hadi: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Jan 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Jan 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyBoth accused were found guilty.
14	Public Prosecutor v S K Murugan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was found guilty and convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine.
15	Liew Zheng Yang v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Attempted Drug Possession 12 Oct 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Other	12 Oct 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): OtherThe Public Prosecutor's proposed sentencing framework was not adopted by the court.
16	Liew Zheng Yang v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Conspiracy to Traffic Drugs & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Jul 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	13 Jul 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal was allowed, and the convictions for the Conspiracy Charges were set aside. Liew was convicted on reduced charges.